> http://newacdgazette.com/2011/04/13/the-tragical-loss-of-bloodlines-and-mentoring/ I read this article and found it fascinating and interesting. The writer is articulate and thorough, but I must admit, that, as usual, I did not agree with it all. It would make for a good discussion however. I do not know the author, but I suspect she is older, and has enough history behind her to look back and make comparisons. So am I, although sometimes I wish I were not. My questions are: 1 Do we old people always look backward and remember how great we were and how sound our breeding programs were and make less than flattering comparisons with the breeding of today? It may be that the sky has fallen and we have ruined our breed, but I sort of doubt it. I like what I see in the ring primarily, although there are some people who do not have a clue and will never be breeders of note. The assumption that this did not exist in the past is a leap of logic that I don't think I can make. 2. Does breeding to winners ruin a program? I know, there are some winning dogs that I would not breed to and some that win for reasons I do not understand. And some winning dogs have turned out to have genetic issues that have set us back generations. But, to breed for mediocrity does have its down side. The show, after all, is our showcase, and if knowledgeable judges consistently put up the same dogs and the same lines, should I ignore that in preference to staying the course with my non-winning dogs? 3. Do the people of the past know less than those who are breeding winning dogs today? In many cases I would agree, but in many cases I think we have far greater knowledge in many areas as time moves forward. Knowledge is not a static thing, but is cumulative - the more we have from the past, the more we can add in the present and the greater the body of knowledge available in the future. Of course, the accumulation of ignorance and stupidity may stick with us also, so what do I know? They both have roots in the past and exist in the present. Just a few of my thoughts as I read the article and an invitation to discuss this perspective..... as my expense of course. Dave. On Amazon ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2011. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in any post. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================