I merely said I have learned to accept this.........
My point is....I have trouble accepting the decision to use smaller photos and
more white space....
Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.marhaven.com
From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Amy Greenhut
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 1:47 PM
To: Martello, Carolyn
Cc: Proud, Jen; Radich, Donna; danielleweitz52@xxxxxxxxx; cnnpmm2; Shepherd,
German
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The REVIEW 'decisions'
I respectfully disagree with you Carolyn.....it is not acceptable for the
review to come the last day of he month.....it should arrive no later than the
middle of each month .
Amy Greenhut
Justrock Shepherds
Home Of Ch.Elway And Ch.Harley And Nichole
Gen Oak Leopard Tortoises And Tortoise Rescue
_____
From: "Carolyn Martello" <marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The REVIEW 'decisions'
No........of course not. This is the January Review and I have learned to
accept this as "on time". <G>
Trust me...I can live with the timing as long as it is a great Review to
"review". It no longer is!
The back page has the Futurities listed wrong....also two wrong dogs on page 32
& 33....but LOTS of
wonderful white space......and that is just noticed with me hardly spending
much time with this Review.
I do know mistakes are easy to make and can be corrected and we will survive
them.....but the decisions
for tiny photos with lots of white space all around and some pages with
magnifying glass letters...and
others in a large Font ( and more white space ) continue to frustrate me.
Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.marhaven.com
From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Jen Proud
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 12:22 PM Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The REVIEW
So you got the FEB Review already?!?
I'm writing the editor again to say I (we) didn't get our January issues...
neither one of them!
:(
I totally understand what you're saying about the text/photos. I actually did
write about that, and how there's no longer any information anymore about the
shows except the winners... and not always more than a name & the win. I loved
having st least sire/dam information to start researching a pedigree!
Thanks
JP&P
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:53 <dmrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have to chime in on this. I am a long-time GSDCA member. I no longer show in
confirmation and thought seriously about whether or not to renew my membership
this year.
No surprise-- I renewed mainly to keep up with show results, including the
PICTURES.
I am magnifying-glass age. However, the ONLY time I need one is when I want to
SEE the pictures in this new format.
I think I know what my renewal decision will be next year.
Donna Radich in NC
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 5, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Danielle Weitz <danielleweitz52@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the Nov/Dec issue I did have to use a magnifying glass on a couple of pages
besides my glasses and now I still have not received my January issue. Not
happy in NJ
Danielle
From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of cnnpmm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 12:19 PM
To: marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'showgsd-l digest users'
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The REVIEW
Carolyn writes: "It is the pictures of these beautiful dogs that bring us back
to the Review over and over until the next one arrives, as we look at winners,
stud dogs, upcoming stars, check out Breed improvement, bloodlines, etc."
And this is exactly why I cherish my Review collection from 1947 - forward; the
pictures of the dogs!
I don't understand why the format of the Review was changed when the new editor
came on board. What was wrong with the old format? I hope that the "problems"
with the Review are being addressed and we'll see improvement in the next issue.
Paulette
