[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The Board Meeting / answers - handlers judging

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "TISHW@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: gsdmum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lindabankhead44@xxxxxxxxx, edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:40:34 -0400

I don't know if the rules have been changed but it was a requirement that a
judge could not judge in his own region and had to reside a certain
distance away.

Tish

Tish Walker
Fredericksburg, VA
TishW@xxxxxxx


In a message dated 7/27/2015 11:37:28 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
gsdmum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:


The regions cited were the Northeast (we’ve already heard from Scott) and
the Mid Atlantic which was Jimmy Moses.
First, Jim is no longer a handler, hasn’t been for a few years, second, he
bred/co-bred, owns/co-owns so many dogs in the eastern regions, too many
could not enter & show under him. Unfortunately, not the best choice of
judge by the host club for that region.
The Southeast had a HUGE entry for Terry Hower (former handler) and the
two point shows there drew over 70 entries each.
The BOD forgot that in 2014, the LARGEST entries were for Art Sinclair in
the Midwest, Ben Bigornia in the Northeast and Jerry Guzman (same position
as Jimmy, former handler now judge) in the Mid Atlantic. The Mid Pacific
entry for Mike Sherman wasn’t bad either.

Joannie Intersimone
GSDCA Futurity Co-Chairman


From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Linda Bankhead
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 7:56 AM
To: edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "" <wynsum@xxxxxxx>; "" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The Board Meeting / answers


What Fut lost entries due to a handler judging and why was this decision
made in a closed session? The Fut Chair should have been involved in the
discussion. She could have informed them that Scott has only handled in The
NE 1 time in 40 years and George never handled in the region he judged.
Major decision the BOD made without asking the chair for facts and
information.












____________________________________
(https://www.avast.com/antivirus)
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
_www.avast.com_ (https://www.avast.com/antivirus)


Other related posts: