Yes,Evan. Gary was involved later when I was President. We originally
went with the bigger size around 1997 or 1998. Lois Frislin was editor.
Barbara Woelfel Lopez did a lot of the research and pushed the board to change
the size of the Review.
Tish
Tish Walker
Fredericksburg, VA
TishW@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 3/15/2016 4:43:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
This is most interesting. We went to the larger size due to it saving the
club a great deal of money. As I recall Gary had some input since he is
involved with publishing. Gail Sprock also helped with the decision.
Now evidently it is cheaper to go bigger. I don't think we know the whole
story. I wonder if anyone can find the minutes from when we went to the
larger pages? I do remember the savings were substantial. As I recall, the
smaller size required special expenses since it was not a normal page size,
and I remember the editor at the time also gave us that information.
Evan
http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
German Shepherd Youth Recognition Fund_http://asgardgermanshepherd.com_ ;
(http://asgardgermanshepherd.com/)
_Click here: Asgard German Shepherds
In a message dated 3/15/2016 1:03:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Interesting...seriously, this has come up before and we were always told
that the old smaller size was more expensive because it was non-standard.
Hmmmmm, why the hell didn't they vote to go to smaller size and save money?
That is very odd. Susan should weigh in, but suppose she is not on the
list. Cynthia. vande001@xxxxxxxxx
_ (http://asgardgermanshepherd.com/)
