[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Science of Gait

  • From: VPREZHMF@xxxxxxx
  • To: tazi1970@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:09:13 EDT

 
In a message dated 7/19/2006 10:01:18 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
tazi1970@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Rachel  Page Elliot's Dogsteps is far more accurate in application to dogs. 
Her Canine  Cineradiography done at Harvard is definitive. Then you have Curtis 
Brown's  Dog Locomotion and Gait Analysis. While it is very dry it is 
accurate and  species specific. Finally there is Gilbert & Brown's K-9 
Structure &  
Terminology which describes gaits in layman's terms and does not dumb it  down.

So to sum http://vanat.cvm.umn.edu/gaits/html, it is very well  done but 
certainly more applicable to horses than dogs and many other  species.




Well spoken Pat. I'm glad you posted this--- Helen Miller  Fisher


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Science of Gait