VERY old news, Ginger. As a matter of fact, I think ONE of those passed BSL, the others with the good people of Colorado working hard, passed good dangerous dog ordinances and no BSL. Not that there shouldn't be diligence, and the Coloradans are still dilligent. The most recent discussion centers around Englewood, CO and hopefully, the Coloradans will go to their council meeting and explore alternatives to BSL. But you did forward almost 10 month old posting, here. Stormy In a message dated 10/12/06 4:53:45 PM, cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Now six cities and one county are looking at either passing bans or > restrictions on pit bulls or retooling their vicious-animal ordinances, > concerned that they will see an influx of dangerous dogs as a result of the > new restrictions. Lone Tree and Parker will take up the pit-bull issue at > council meetings Jan. 17. > "You may never know what results come from your action. But if you do nothing, there will be no result." Mahatma Gandhi Stormy Hope *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~* Dog's love is different, it requires no return UPDATED 2/11/06....CHECK IT OUT!!!! www.FairhopeGSD.com ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues ============================================================================