Well, without going to one side of the fence or the other, here is a quote from two sources re: Reservation of Rights. The membership should appreciate the openness of this Board in keeping us up to date with this very important matter, is my personal opinion. The communication, negative or positive, IS appreciated. Here it is from a couple of lawyer websites, nothing in there with my interpretation. I'm not a lawyer, and never pretend to be one. Although my daughter is:-) Simple and clear http://www.irmi.com/online/insurance-glossary/terms/r/reservation-of-rights.aspx reservation of rights An insurer's notification to an insured that coverage for a claim may not apply. Such notification allows an insurer to investigate (or even defend) a claim to determine if coverage applies (in whole or in part) without waiving its right to later deny coverage based on information revealed by the investigation. Although a reservation of rights protects an insurer's interests, it also alerts an insured to the fact that some elements of a claim may not be covered, thereby allowing the insured to take necessary steps to protect its potentially uninsured interests. http://www.mclaughlin-online.com/librarytmc/whitepapers/reservation-rights.html How should you react to a Reservation of Rights Letter? Reservation-of-rights letters often leave our insureds scratching their heads in shock and anger. What does the insurer mean? How should we react to the letter? A reservation-of-rights letter does not mean the claim isn’t covered. It does suggest that a cloud hovers over your coverage. It signals that the insurer thinks there might be grounds to deny coverage for at least part of the claim. A claim can allege some counts that the policy may or may not cover, such as intentional torts, financial loss with no property damage or bodily injury, or a matter clearly outside the policy scope. A claim may include both covered and excluded matters. On Jun 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Kmgraphic2@xxxxxxx wrote: > An insurance company will send a Reservation-of-Rights letter for > MANY > reasons, NOT simply "if they think there might be intentional acts > causing > the damages." As this lawsuit is ongoing and we all have our own > individual > opinions on the matter, I think the above-quoted statement is just > a tad > skewed to one side of the fence. > ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2010. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================