[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Review History ---Review Editor "NO SHOW" Rules

  • From: "Kathaleen Strong" <inflight2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'Peggy'" <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:32:31 -0700

    Don't put words in my mouth, Kathaleen.  I don't know how you get 
your interpretation from what I wrote..........I didn't say a thing 
about judging or judges.

>>>>>>>What part of : "I'm using this post as a stepping stone" did you
misinterpret -- which generally means taking it a bit further than what the
writer wrote.  There is no "interpretation" of what you wrote, I was fully
cognizant of what you were saying --- I merely took it a bit further!  Good
grief.

However, if you insist, then you tell me why people advertise, if not to 
let everyone else, including judges, know about their dogs?  Why do 
people brag on the list about their wins?  My personal experience is that
people like to look at their OWN ads...but not if they are messed up....

>>>I think I clearly outlined the same thing -- why people would advertise
-- but if you look at the clear trend in this club -- the issue prior to the
National is generally 2 or 3 x as large as the rest of the months -- not
with editorial or article content -- but advertising content -- It would
seem to make sense that these advertisements were there to hopefully
"influence" the judge.  In recent years, I think it's actually done the
trick -- but then I already had the opinion that the idjit quotient was
pretty high for some of these officials anyway. <EG>

Perhaps you have never paid for an advertisement, or had one messed up, 
either with incorrect spelling, bad placement, or just not handled 
well...or perhaps you do not advertise at all.    Until that happens to 
you, you know what you can do with that stepping stone.
Peggy

>>>Again, I guess you did not fully read what I wrote and understand that my
post also included the facts that I had also advertised in the past and gave
my reasons.  I also have had ads that were poorly placed (early on, I could
be guaranteed that no matter when my ad got in, it would be the last one).
I've also had ads that were screwed up and the thing that used to make me
insane -- was when I had ads in certain issues and the Review came out LATE.

I hope our new Editor can keep her current trend up and keep the Review
coming out on time == and maybe I can get back to my dreamland of the Review
coming out at the first of the Month... like we used to.

In any event, since I seem to aggravate you by quoting your posts -- even if
I use them only as a stepping stone -- I will no longer do so.

Regards,

Kathaleen
 


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================

Other related posts: