[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Requirements to Judge a Futurity
- From: Kathy Potter <tokaye@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gsdmum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, cudjoegsd@xxxxxxxxxxx, carolynmckenna@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:09:40 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Handlers can now judge Futurities.
Kathy
-----Original Message-----
>From: Carolyn Martello <marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Apr 26, 2013 2:57 PM
>To: gsdmum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, cudjoegsd@xxxxxxxxxxx, carolynmckenna@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Lyneagle@xxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Requirements to Judge a Futurity
>
>It is difficult to find judges for our Specialty shows that will draw
>a great entry that has not already judged in close proximity of time and
>distance. Add that same problem to finding one for a Futurity the same
>weekend.
>I like the idea of a Breeder or even a Handler judging the futurities.
>We totally understand the 'qualification's and procedure' that a judge
>goes through with AKC.... but Breeders and Handlers know the Breed and
>the Breed Standard just as well as judges. Hopefully they are just as
>mindful of the Standard and the movement as any Judge....and they are
>using that knowledge every single weekend as they 'show' the results of
>their breeding decisions..... and/or handling those results.
>Most of us just opt to NOT become a Judge. Many would do a GREAT job
>but the restrictions prevent them from accepting assignments.
>
>
>Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>www.marhaven.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>To: cudjoegsd@xxxxxxxxxxx; carolynmckenna@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Lyneagle@xxxxxxx;Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Requirements to Judge a
>Futurity
>
>The futurity committee is always open to new ideas. What do you think the
>requirements of a non-licensed judge should be?
>Joannie
>________________________________
>From: "cudjoegsd@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cudjoegsd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Requirements to Judge a Futurity
>
>Carolyn- I could not agree with you more. Although I am doing a Futurity
>this
>year, it has always been my belief that AKC recognized judges should not be
>allowed to judge our futurities. I feel it is a great honor to be selected
>to
>judge a futurity and accepting that honor is very fulfilling as a judge.
>The
>futurities are supposed to be a breeders showcase and I think breeders
>should
>judge the futurities. The present requirements to judge a futurity are much
>too
>restrictive and need revision. Many people who disagree with me point out
>the
>occasional disaster futurity when judged by a novice judge. What about the
>disaster when a recognized judge does a futurity? This is something the
>Futurity Committee should consider e.g. changing the judging requirements.
>
>D.D.
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:33 AM, carolyn mckenna wrote:
>
>> What were the requirements when the futurities were first implemented ? I
>seem
>>to> remember that anyone the club selected could judge. It was to be a
>breeders'
>> showcase; top breeders were chosen, sometimes handlers. Perhaps over-
>>regulation> is hurting our futurities; After all, who cares if the person
>in the middle of
>>the ring> has been a ring steward. Geesh ! Wonder if the same judges who
>judge our
>>specialties> are judging our futurities might be a bit over-kill.
>> Carolyn
>>
>
>============================================================================
>POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original
>author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
>are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
>Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
>
>Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and
>its administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed
>in any post.
>
>ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
>MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
>PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
>FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
>PROSECUTED.
>
>For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
>SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
>NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
>============================================================================
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
