[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Rebuttal to James Moses from Dorothy Linn

  • From: "Theresa-GSD Stolz-Scenecrest Farm" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "scenecrest.geo@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: nancy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, showgsd <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:31:19 -0700

Since several longtime members do go to the GSDCA Nationals, why not set aside
some time to do the interviews?  History is a very important part of the GSD 
breed
and people that experienced it should be heard. Each person has their own
history to tell, while some disagree with another listening to all sides is a 
great
way to learn.  I have collected for many years the history, genetics, pedigrees 
with
talking or writing to people in the GSD breed as this is important for 
learning.  

There are dedicated people in the GSD breed and once they are gone it is too 
late
to listen to their stories. The people that experienced it tell the facts where 
their relatives
do not always remember all of them. I listened to my German grandparents and my 
parents
talk of GSDs and the dogs they brought here.  My father knew Lloyd Brackett  
talked of
him but I have probably forgotten more than I remember.  

Changing the GSDCA Standard should not happen as history has been
set by people who knew the outcome and lived it. They decided what was best for 
the GSD breed.
Max stated white was forbidden and the breeders in the USA agreed it was 
undesirable to
form the DQ as were all the faded colors from the beginning undesirable. 

Theresa
GSDCA Member
scenecrest.geo@xxxxxxxxx

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 8/21/14, Nancy Harper Mulvaney <nancy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 Tom Brown was nominated
 by the Centennial Chair to head up the historical
 chair position and was subsequently approved by
 unanimous vote of the then
 current Board. 
 Tom and Vivian were in NY attending, I believe,  the AKC
 Delegate Meeting, Tom consulted the NY
 telephone directory and lo and behold
 he
 discovered the Eristoff name,(Anne Tracey's married
 name) an unusual name
 indeed. Tom called and
 was in touch with a gentleman relative who referred
 Tom to another  elderly lady relative who
 stated she had some of Anne's
 items in a
 trunk, I believe in the attic.  So Tom and Vivian made the
 trip
 to the house of the relative and
 scanned some of the documents, and of
 course
 they were in Anne's hand - no computers in those days. 
 I believe Tom
 planned to use some of the
 information from the old New England issues in
 the Centennial Booklet to be entitled "THE
 EARLY YEARS".  Tom and Vivian
 also
 spent many, many hours in the AKC archives going through
 piles of
 documents, letters, catalogues etc.
 The original plan was to have an "EARLY
 YEARS BOOKLET" for attendees.  Those not
 able to attend would be able to
 order
 "THE EARLY YEARS" at a later date.  "THE
 EARLY YEARS" booklet was
 canned in
 favor of a 100 year book as it was our 100th year.  The 100
 year
 book is a work in
 progress.   The formation of a Historical
 Committee was
 suggested. As we lose many of
 our older, experienced members we lose our
 History.  For example when the knowledgeable
 Bob Penney passed away his
 collection went
 to the dumpster. What a pity!!! We need to be collecting
 our
 history while we can.  Connie
 Beckhardt's husband Ted is gratefully still
 with us.  As a  pillar of our breed in her
 day, I sincerely hope the
 Historical
 Committee has approached Ted regarding historical items
 left
 behind by Connie. Where is Connie's
 history, will it also end up in the
 dumpster?  Let's hope
 not.   
 
 Nancy
 Harper-Mulvaney  
 
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
  On Behalf Of Joan Fox (Redacted sender "campaignersgsd@xxxxxxxxx"
 
 
  COMMENTS:
 
 Re
 Jim's statement, " the original GSDCA Standard from
 1928 was based on a
 point system, 100 points
 allotted, NOT ONE single point allotted for gait"
 
 Fact: The original GSDCA
 Standard was written by Anne Tracey (Eristoff)) in
 1912 ( NOT 1928) prior to utilization of it
 during the formation of the
 GSDCA in 1913.
 (Anne Tracey was one of the 7 founding members and one of
 the
 first GSDCA Presidents)
 
 The original  Standard's
  first page DID indeed list a German type 100 point
 system , BUT was followed on subsequent pages
 by detailed Paragraphs with
 specific
 headings ( including GAIT) describing in detail the
 virtues
 required of the German Shepherd
  Dog.  Quote: " GAIT --- when running the
 legs should move evenly and in harmony with
 each other and with the back.
 The strides
 should be long and elastic, lifting the feet only just clear
 of
 the ground. The higher he lifts his feet,
 the lower his speed. "
 
 Re whites " doubt it really presents
 problem for GSD's"
 
 Fact : Whites and off colors (blues , livers,
 paling colors) DID present a
 growing problem
 against preserving the integrity of the GSD Breed and
 directly  resulted In the creation of the
 present Standard.!!
   With a permissive
 1943 Standard that stated ONLY that washed out colors
 were " not preferred" and "
 white dogs are not desirable" and were to be
 DQ'd  only " if showing albino
 characteristics", the mismatched and
 indiscriminate breeding of colors pro-ported to
 be "unusual" and "rare" were
 all too frequent. Popularity of the GSD was
 extremely high at that time, and
 puppy mills
 rampant,  with little or no attention to preservation of
 character and breed type. Litters of blues ,
 pale looking brown pups,
  whites with tan
 and lack mantels , were hawked to an unsuspecting and
 gullible  public at prices hundreds of dollars
 more than " a mere black and
 tan"
 puppy. I am familiar with these situations, as my first GSD
 pup was
 purchased in 1957 , and thank
 goodness I was steered clear of these
 disasters. ($50 for my pet pup sired by Ch
 Llano Estacados Fernando)
 
 The defense against this destruction was to
 create a breed  Standard with
 teeth. The
 1968 Standard of today took from 1959 to1968 to craft
 with
 COMBINED GSDCA Boards AND MEMBERSHIP
 Input, documented in Minutes and
 Presidents
 Reports appearing in the GS Dog Review in those years.
 
 It is interesting to see that
 some want HISTORY TO REPEAT ITSELF, which is
 certainly evident in the  parallel wording of
 the 1943 Standard  and the
 "revised
 GSD Standard "
 

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2014.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and its 
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in 
any post.

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org  SUBSCRIPTION: 
http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================

Other related posts: