[ SHOWGSD-L ] RE The Pups Bill

From: Stormy Hope <Stormy435@xxxxxxx>
To: gsd showlist <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:50:02 -0700
Glanced at that... not SIXTY (60) people, but 6 people.  Cofffeeee and
too early in the morning!   sorry)  Probably more in there:-(
Storm


On Aug 22, 2011, at 7:36 AM, Stormy Hope wrote:

Thanks  for reading the bill and writing a letter.  That's what all
concerned dog owners should do.

Regarding owning 1 intact female over 4 months and 50 pups OFFERED for
sale (not sold), please remember the details are in the regulations,
which may be changed.  So 60 people all co own one intact female and
each have a litter, all 6 are now under USDA regulations.  Can't
happen?  Maybe not, but regulations are easier to change than laws.
And in a couple of years, that number can be reduced to 20 pups
offered for sale, then it becomes a reality.

Actually, as you are aware, many states have much stricter regulation
even now.  PUPS has the number as 50 OFFERED for sale by any person
involved with a breeder who is producing 50 pups, and that includes
co-
owners.  Among you (generic you) and your co-owners, I would bet there
are 50 pups OFFERED for sale.


And several breeders who are producing good quality pups with kennel
help are doing a great job taking care of 50 or more pups OFFERED for
sale a year.  I know lots of people scoff at incremental, but this is
a true fact about any of these bills that are coming out now.  The
goal isn't better care, more government incursions into business, but
NO breeding, no animal use.  If that is extreme thinking, then perhaps
a re-read of the underlying philosophy of all Animal Rights groups is
in order.


The biggest problem with this bill is that, after 20 years of fighting
(since Doris Day vs Venneman), they are still trying to include you/us
breeders who sell retail.  The law now exempts us, this bill would
include us and it would get worse from that point forward.  When we
start having to keep our dogs under USDA housing rules, that means no
more pups born in the house, (unless we have those cement floors with
a drain :-).
>
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2011.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and its 
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in 
any post.

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org  
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
[ SHOWGSD-L ] RE The Pups Bill

Other related posts:
