_http://www.jdnews.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Details.cfm &StoryID=35201&Section=News_ (http://www.jdnews.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Details.cfm&StoryID=35201&Section=News) Animal ordinance revisions OK'd September 22,2005 BY JOE MILLER DAILY NEWS STAFF Cats won't have to be on a leash, but many animal breeders would have to register with the county. That's if the Onslow County Board of Commissioners approves a revised animal control ordinance. The county Board of Health unanimously signed off on the plan Tuesday night. County Attorney Ron vonLembke indicated many residents said putting cats on a leash wasn't practical. "I got a chuckle if not an outright guffaw in response (from people)," he said. VonLembke also found that most cat complaints arose from free-roaming felines whose owners did not try to keep them confined. He recommended the county focus instead on preventing stray animals. The law would prohibit animals, including cats, from roaming off its owner's property. "We wanted to put the responsibility and burden on people that don't keep track of their cats," said commissioner and health board member Martin Aragona Jr. Jacksonville resident Eddie Quinn adamantly spoke in favor of requiring cats to be on a leash. He said cats and dogs should not be treated differently. Quinn is a candidate in the November race for Jacksonville City Council. "Both can cause property damage and injury or death unless properly restrained," he told the Board of Health. "Some members of this board, I believe, are biased in favor of cat owners and prefer to abdicate their responsibilities to provide fair equitable protection to all citizens, including non-cat owners." Board member Dr. Tracy Custis-Raynor responded by saying dogs are more easily trained than cats, and so guidelines for dogs are expected to be different. The ordinance would also regulate large-volume breeders and so-called "puppy mills." The county doesn't regulate puppy mills now. VonLembke said Congress is considering legislation requiring the Food and Drug Administration to regulate and inspect puppy mills, but he said the county doesn't have to wait for Congress to act. "If and when the federal legislation is passed, we as a county have the right to have stricter requirements," he said. The county's proposal defines a large-volume breeder as "any person, corporation, owner or keeper that sells at retail or wholesale any dog or cat for any purpose." However, it would not apply to retail pet stores that obtain all dogs and cats at wholesale from other sources, nonprofit animal rescue groups and anyone who in a calendar year sells a maximum of 25 dogs or cats to the public or does not give birth to more than six litters of dogs or cats and sells only dogs or cats bred or raised on the owner's property to people buying an animal for personal enjoyment. Large-volume breeders would have to register with the county Health Department, keep records of everyone from whom dogs or cats were purchased and be subject to inspections without prior notice. Commissioners deferred action on the ordinance in June as many complained about plans to define a puppy mill as an operation with more than eight non-neutered or non-spayed dogs 4 months of age or older. VonLembke said if the ordinance is adopted, animal control will visit all known large-volume breeders and present owners with copies of the requirements, but officers won't start immediately writing citations. "They want to give people an opportunity to see what it is they have to do," he said. There have been numerous complaints over the past few years to Onslow County Animal Control about Rosie Harper, who has sold dogs from her property on N.C. 24 behind BNS Printing. Harper has maintained she doesn't operate a puppy mill. "We're satisfying the reputable breeders and at the same time we're going to take care of those facilities that are abusing and neglecting animals," Aragona said. Commissioners could vote on the ordinance at their meeting Oct. 3. Ginger Cleary, Rome, GA "Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." Benjamin Franklin. _http://www.rihadin.com_ (http://www.rihadin.com/) ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================