Here's where it gets gritty. The appeasement to showdogs's owners to keep them quiet. WRITE!! Talking points included in this long and factual post from the OAIA (Oklahoma Animal Interest Alliance)/ S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The FACTS About Committee Substitute HB 1332 The Oklahoma Pet Quality Assurance Act February 15, 2009 HB 1332: Pending legislation that will require that anyone who is a breeder, person, firm, corporation or other association that qualifies and is certified as a breeder, dealer, animal rescue, out-of-state dealer/breeder, shelter, or retail pet store that sells, gives away, or transfers a cumulative total of twenty-five or more animals of any age in any one (1) calendar to be subject to licensure and inspections which mirror USDA standards. This legislation contains the following: .. Includes all animal rescue organizations that utilize foster homes if they transfer more than 25 animals per calendar year and excludes all shelters. .. Stipulates that out of state breeders cannot transport in OK without a state license. Under the substitute bill provisions allow the exclusion of those that participate in only in dog shows and field trials. This leaves many who travel into Oklahoma for other dog related events. This statement that was inserted to appease Oklahoma's Dog Clubs and now excludes many other dog sports and activities such as training sessions, informal matches, hunting activities and public awareness events which are not classified as a dog show or field event. .. Calls for the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture to develop and implement regulations pertaining to this bill. There is nothing that requires representation from stakeholders or public input. Administrative rules provide for notice to the public but does not require for stakeholder participation in the development of the actual regulations. Experts and responsible breeders should be consulted in the development and implementation of such a complicated process. This should be put into the legislation to ensure that participation of stakeholders is guaranteed. .. The bill will duplicate federal regulations and laws already in place. It would be more beneficial and fiscally responsible to build legislation to support the federal agency and enforce laws already in place not duplicate efforts. .. The bill proposes to assess fees and fines as the revenue source to implement and sustain the activities of this law. Even if these were assessed on the questionable estimation given as to the number of breeders in the state the funding would still not meet the estimated $500,000 to develop this new program. The state bares the fiscal responsibility to ensure that funds are available. The state's fundraising methods are to impose higher taxes. With the expected shortfall in state revenue and the threat of cutting services to Oklahomans this is not the time to impose additional tax burden on Oklahoma's individuals and families .. The provisions regarding warrantless search and seizure by enforcement personnel are clearly unconstitutional. The following is a direct quote from the text of the bill: Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry personnel and agents shall have the right to enter the premises of an individual or facility and conduct inspections. Supporters of this bill state this pertains to licensees and/or applicants however the language of this bill does not define an "individual". It appears that this leaves the door open for those that do not qualify to be subjected to unwarranted searches and seizures. The legislation should state specifically that inspections/searches pertain to only those that are applicants and/or licensees. .. Penalties include liens against the licensee's personal property for failure to meet fines. While understandable that the state would want to recoup fines, it seems vindictive to attach liens to personal property. .. Responsible breeders follow ethics guidelines and existing federal laws. The provisions of HB 1332 will force substandard breeders to burrow further underground making identification and enforcement impossible. .. There are no incentives for those that follow ethical guidelines established by Parent Breed Clubs, obtain health and genetic testing to ensure consumers have healthy quality family pets. .. The bill does not list an element for consumer protection and attaches all the responsibility to breeders. There is nothing that encourages consumers to purchase from responsible sources and provides education in finding healthy pets. Summary: HB 1332 continues to impose punitive measures that duplicate federal efforts. This bill will have a negative impact on responsible breeders with valid USDA licenses, those that visit our state for recreation and legitimate organizations that provide a valuable rescue services to animals. . While OAIA encourages animal advocates to look for solutions to community pet issues HB 1332 as written cannot solve the issues of producing healthy pets for consumers and eliminating substandard breeding practices. OAIA logo 300dpi.jpg Oklahoma Animal Interest Alliance email: oaiasec@xxxxxxxxx -- Stormy Hope carpoc.org GSDCA Member And more clubs ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2008. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================