[ SHOWGSD-L ] New Texas Bills Unfair to Responsible Owners and Breeders
- From: Stormy Hope <Stormy435@xxxxxxx>
- To: showgsd-l List <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:26:57 -0800
This ALERT isn't up on the AKC Government Relations Legislative Alerts
Website yet. As soon as I see it there, I'll forward it on.
Stormy
New Texas Bills Unfair to Responsible Owners and Breeders
Two bill of concern have been introduced in the Texas State
Legislature and AKC encourages Texas residents to begin educating
their legislators about the unintended consequences of these measures.
House Bill 998 will require that anyone who owns an intact male dog
over 20 pounds that is EVER off the owners property unleashed or not
in a “secure enclosure” purchase $100,000 in liability insurance.
House Bill 1451 will define and regulate “commercial” breeders of dogs
and cats. The bill has low thresholds, requires inspections of private
property without any proof of animal neglect or cruelty, and breeders
will be charged unspecified fees for their license.
Both these bills are costly, ineffective and do not improve the health
and quality of life for Texas dogs. They will place financial burdens
on responsible owners and breeders at a time when many Texans are
struggling to pay their bills. Additional specifics about HB 998 and
HB 1451 can be found below.
The American Kennel Club strongly supports humane treatment of dogs,
including an adequate and nutritious diet, clean water, clean living
conditions, regular veterinary care, kind and responsive human
companionship, and training in appropriate behavior. The AKC also
supports reasonable and enforceable laws that protect the welfare and
health of purebred dogs and do not restrict the rights of breeders and
owners who take their responsibilities seriously.
What You Can Do
Responsible owners and breeders in Texas are encouraged to call their
representatives and ask them to oppose these measures. To find out who
represents you in the state legislature, click here.
House Bill 998
HB 998 requires that all intact male dogs over 20 pounds be kept in a
secure enclosure, a term that is generally associated with
requirements for dogs that have been deemed dangerous. In many
jurisdictions a simple backyard fence will not suffice. Further, it is
unclear if a homeowner’s policy will be sufficient proof of insurance.
Separate liability policies are expensive and hard to find.
Furthermore, the bill assumes that any unneutered male dog is a
problem – an unfair and unrealistic conclusion.
This measure will negatively impact sportsmen, ranchers and farmers.
This burden will also fall on those who train and compete with their
animals in events such asobedience, rally, agility and field trials.
The bill does not provide exemptions for service or assistance
animals. In short, HB 998 is a vague solution in search of a problem
which will create a financial burden on responsible owners and will
not improve public safety. AKC supports reasonable dangerous dog laws
such as thosethat address specific and measureable criteria by which a
dog is determined to be dangerous.
House Bill 1451
HB 1451 defines a commercial breeder as anyone who owns eleven intact
female animals (dogs and cats) and is engaged in the business of
breeding animals for direct or indirect sale. This would include a
breeder who sells even one dog or litter per year!
Additional provisions of the bill include:
• Requires an annual unannounced inspection of a breeder’s property.
The low thresholds in the bill mean that small breeders will be
included, many of whom may not have regular business hours. It is
unclear what would happen if an inspector arrived and the owner was
unavailable.
• Inspections can be conducted by third-party designees, including
local animal control officers and contract employees. Although the
bill says the state “may” provide training to these inspectors, it
does not mandate it. This creates the possibility that rules may not
be equitably applied and that some inspectors may have little to no
experience in animal husbandry.
• Fees are not specified in the bill although the measure says they
should cover the cost of establishing an inspections program, possible
training for inspectors, and paying for the time and travel necessary
to conduct inspections. It is possible that a tiered licensing
schedule will be established based on the number of dogs owned, but
the cost is likely to be excessive for someone who breeds only a few
litters per year.
• The bill will limit breeders to 50 intact females unless the
breeder submits a special application and complies with any additional
requirements to be developed laterin the regulation process.
• Requires breeders to undergo a criminal background check. AKC
believes that it is appropriate to ensure that licenses are not
provided to those who have animal cruelty violations, but that
including unrelated offenses that have no bearing on the fitness of a
dog breeder is unreasonable. This will also be an additional financial
burden on the applicant who will likely bear the cost of the
background check.
• Establishes a public database of licensees and disciplinary
actions. The thresholds in this bill are so low as to include many
breeders who breed in their homes. It is unreasonable for a small
breeder to be required to post their name, address and other personal
information on a public registry.
• Establishes the “Commercial Breeder Enforcement Enhancement &
Training Fund” which may offer rewards for information leading to
disciplinary action. This incentivizes frivolous reports of
insignificant violations and will create a burden for inspectors and
for the breeders who must fund the program. The bill does not address
who pays the costs if a breeder is found innocent of allegations.
• Regulations would be written and enforced by the Texas Commission
of Licensing and Regulation. AKC is concerned that none of the
commissioners has a background in agriculture or animal husbandry. We
believe that it is vital that stakeholders, including responsible
breeders, be involved in the drafting of regulations governing
responsible animal ownership and breeding.
If you would rather not receive future communications from The
American Kennel Club, let us know by clicking here.
The American Kennel Club, 8051 Arco Corporate Dr. Suite 100, Raleigh,
NC 27617 United
States============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2011. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
- » [ SHOWGSD-L ] New Texas Bills Unfair to Responsible Owners and Breeders - Stormy Hope
