A flawed animal control measure..." ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- By Jennifer Jordan Hall Special to The Courier-Journal After two deadly pit bull attacks, the Louisville Metro Council has been working to protect the public from dangerous dogs. To that end, all agree that irresponsible pet owners must be held accountable. However, the current legislative proposal, drafted by Metro Animal Services (MAS), is no longer about dangerous dogs. Instead, it completely overhauls Louisville's animal control laws. This proposal is too broad and complex, legally problematic and unfairly punishes responsible pet owners. For example, the proposal will prohibit individuals from giving their pet away or putting it up for adoption if they are no longer able to properly care for it (91.099). This will increase the euthanasia of pets who could have found loving homes. The proposal also prohibits female dogs with a litter under four months old from having contact with anyone other than its owner (91.003). But, to responsibly pick the appropriate dog for their family/lifestyle, buyers should evaluate the behavior, breeding and character traits of the puppy's parents. This proposal inhibits a buyer's ability to make these informed decisions. The proposal requires that dogs be "restrained" at all times. Your dog must be on a leash, unless you have a fenced yard or similar enclosure (91.001). In addition, this proposal requires that every such enclosure have a "child-proof entrance." Those who have installed invisible fences for their pets will not be able to use them if their dog (male or female) is unaltered or considered a public nuisance. This proposal requires mandatory reporting of all dog bites (91.038). The consequences of this blanket reporting rule are devastating. A doctor must report your own dog if it has unintentionally bitten you. Once a bite is reported, your dog will be declared a "dangerous dog." Further, the proposal attacks basic property rights. Your dog will be considered a "potentially dangerous dog" if it chases or tries to bite an illegal trespasser on your property. If your dog actually bites that illegal trespasser, it will be declared a "dangerous dog" (91.112 (J)). Even more problematic are the proposed changes in nuisance laws (91.001). A nuisance can arise from "any act of an animal or its owner that irritates [or] perturbs" a neighbor. Such a broad definition creates ludicrous results. You will be held liable if you allow your cat to mew "in an excessive fashion." Cats mew and dogs bark; they are animals. Such behavior cannot be legislated out of existence and attempting to do so will only serve to increase contentious, expensive litigation. The proposed penalties for nuisances are stiff (91.110). After two violations, you must purchase a public nuisance license and public nuisance sign for your property. Your dog must be confined indoors at all times. Further, you may not sell or give your pet away. Nor may you move or change the location of the pet without authorization from MAS. Such restrictions on your movement are unconstitutional. The driving force behind these changes is MAS's desire to give animal control officers broader enforcement powers. Animal control officers can go onto private property, "canvass" any "dwelling unit" and seize a pet from private property (91.012). If your dog is seized, it can be spayed and neutered, or euthanized within five days. You will be responsible for all accompanying medical costs and boarding fees. The proposal also "seeks to generate more income from pet licensing fees and fines," to help pay for a new dog pound facility and new animal control transport vehicles (MAS has 13 transport units for five on-duty officers, so it is unclear why they need more). But allowing animal control officers to enter private property to seize animals is not a responsible way to achieve this goal. According to MAS, only 15 percent of all pets are licensed. Increasing license registrations is a much less invasive way to raise needed funds. Given the magnitude of the proposed changes, the Metro Council has wisely created an advisory board to study the proposal further. Dangerous dogs can't be eradicated by bad laws. Knowledgeable community participation will help ensure that any changes to Louisville's animal control laws are reasonable and protect the basic rights of pet owners and families, while also ensuring the safety of the general public. Jennifer Jordan Hall is a Louisville attorney. ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ Here is the web site page to find out who your council representative is if you reside in the Louisville Ky area: _http://www.louisvilleky.gov/MetroCouncil/default.htm_ (http://www.louisvilleky.gov/MetroCouncil/default.htm) Ginger Cleary He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself. ~Thomas Paine Rome, GA http://www.rihadin.com/ ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues ============================================================================