[ SHOWGSD-L ] Mandatory spay/neuter proposed for Tacoma with editorial comment

  • From: "Ginger Cleary" <cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Showgsd-L@Freelists. Org" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:44:08 -0500

Ginger Cleary, Rome, GA
Never underestimate the ability of the hypocritical to hoodwink the
sanctimonious. www.rihadin.com
  -----Original Message-----


  Comment - it's estimated that less than 1% of cats
  euthanized at shelters were deliberately bred. Except
  for pit bulls and Rotties (who are very difficult to
  rehome b/c people are afraid to take one with an
  unknown history), only 17% of dogs euthanized at
  shelters were deliberately bred.

  The place to stop unwanted animals is to stop
  unplanned and unwanted litters - not to attack the
  planned and wanted litters from responsible breeders.

  http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/6196804p-5416123c.html

  Fix your pet or pay for a permit?

  ADAM LYNN; The News Tribune
  Published: October 28th, 2006 01:00 AM
  Tacoma residents who own an unaltered dog or cat would
  be required to buy an annual breeders permit ? whether
  they intend to breed their pet or not ? under proposed
  changes to the city?s animal control ordinance.

  The new fee would be in addition to the $55-per-animal
  charge they already pay.

  City Councilwoman Julie Anderson is championing the
  revisions to the code, which are tentatively scheduled
  for a public hearing Nov. 24.

  Anderson said this week that requiring pet owners to
  pay higher fees to keep unaltered animals should
  prompt more people to get their dogs and cats fixed.
  That would help curb what she called a serious pet
  overpopulation problem in the city.

  ?This basically states that having an unaltered animal
  is no longer a right or something you can just do,?
  she said. ?I think of it as a ban on backyard
  breeding.?

  Requiring almost all companion animals to be altered ?
  called a mandatory spay-neuter program ? also will
  help the Humane Society of Tacoma and Pierce County
  toward its goal of becoming a ?no-kill? shelter by the
  end of 2008, she said.

  ?It?s the right thing to do,? Anderson said.

  The Humane Society euthanized more than 2,400 healthy,
  adoptable pets in 2005, according to the
  organization?s Web site.

  What the annual breeders permit in Tacoma would cost
  has not been determined.

  ?Our goal is to make it affordable so people comply,?
  Anderson said.

  Cities and counties across the nation have implemented
  similar measures recently.

  This summer, Los Angeles County began requiring people
  who live in the unincorporated area to get their dogs
  sterilized and microchipped or face a $1,000 fine.
  Albuquerque, N.M., put a mandatory spay-neuter law in
  place earlier this month.

  backed by animal rights groups

  Many national animal welfare organizations ? People
  for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and the Humane
  Society of the United States among them ? support such
  laws.

  ?Only by implementing widespread sterilization
  programs, only by spaying and neutering all companion
  animals, will we get a handle on pet overpopulation,?
  the Humane Society states in a fact sheet posted on
  its Web site.

  Tom Sayre, a spokesman for the Humane Society of
  Tacoma and Pierce County, said his organization
  supports ?the idea 100 percent? if enforcement issues
  are clarified.

  But some organizations, including the American Kennel
  Club, oppose mandatory spay-neuter programs, saying
  they unfairly burden responsible breeders.

  The organization sent letters and e-mails to its
  members in January when Virginia lawmakers proposed a
  mandatory spay-neuter program.

  The letter called the effort ?confusing, ineffective?
  legislation, and urged AKC members to ?contact the
  bill sponsor and express your opposition.?

  Jesse Taylor has been breeding and training Weimaraner
  dogs in Tacoma for more than 30 years.

  Taylor said he supports most spay-neuter programs and
  said Tacoma?s current regulations ? which charge the
  owners of unaltered dogs and cats more for pet
  licenses than those whose animals are fixed ? ?keep
  people who shouldn?t be breeding (animals) from
  breeding.?

  But he said he worries that adding more fees will
  force many to take their breeding programs
  underground.

  ?Let?s face it, if they make it really hard, you?re
  going to have a lot more backyard and closet breeders
  who just aren?t going to pay the fee,? said Taylor,
  who has yet to see Anderson?s proposal. ?If it?s a
  punishment-type penalty, I?m against it. There is a
  place for reputable breeders and good breeders in this
  world.?

  The new rules also call for any dog or cat caught
  running loose by animal control officers to be spayed
  or neutered, even on a first offense.

  working toward no-kill shelter

  City Councilwoman Connie Ladenburg cautioned at an
  August meeting of the council?s Public Safety and
  Human Services Committee that such provisions ?may
  cause a significant problem? among the owners and
  breeders of show dogs, according to minutes of the
  meeting.

  Such folks ?generate a significant amount of income?
  from their dogs and could file suit against the city,
  Ladenburg said.

  Anderson said she is sensitive to the property-rights
  issues involved but is convinced that something must
  be done to ?reduce the pipeline? of unwanted pets
  winding up at the Humane Society.

  The mandatory spay-neuter rules are part of a
  substantial revision of the animal control ordinance
  under consideration by the City Council.

  The proposed changes also refine regulations regarding
  dangerous dogs, prohibit residents from keeping
  livestock or poultry within the city (aside from the
  Metro Parks District, circuses and animal haulers),
  create new rules for animal day-care facilities and
  add regulations on animal noise, among other things.

  The proposal also contains a section titled ?Problem
  Pet Owners,? which defines what a problem pet owner
  would be ? basically, someone who commits multiple
  violations of the code ? and the punishments he or she
  would face: revocation of all pet licenses.

  It?s unlikely the City Council will vote on the
  proposed changes until early next year.

  Adam Lynn: 253-597-8644

  adam.lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Read more Local headlines E-mail this story

  .
  __,_._,___


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Mandatory spay/neuter proposed for Tacoma with editorial comment