Please read Fran's note again and understand where she's coming from in a positive manner. I know only too well, she's right on the money! Being on BOTH sides of the coin, so to speak -- I have so much medical background and dearly love all critters, there comes a time when checking out the way to treat and/or cure an ailment, research is something that is a vital need. Often we need to remember that it ALSO HELPS the critters themselves with like ailments!! Seriously, Fran is right saying that it truly CAN be done decently. How many "hundreds" of years have there been successes in finding cures for so many ailments using the research labs?? -- Far more than any of us could ever count. It can be done "humanely" and in most cases, this is the way. Been there, done that & have known so many times 1 tiny critter has given so many a chance to live and/or be cured. JMHO Norma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fran Henry" <fhenry1@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <windwych@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Show GSD List" <Showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <vande001@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 7:34 PM Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: List of Class B dealers who sell to laboratories in Georgia Dawn, I just think you're painting with too broad a brush. Medical research, I think -- I'm not an expert --, CAN be done humanely. And medical research can help our companion animals as much as it can help humans. Research should not equate with torture. Testing cosmetics is unacceptable, and as Stormy suggests, has gone by the wayside. If carefully controlled research, done with a compassionate eye to the animal, can cure a disease devastating both animals and humans -- isn't that a worthy goal? Where would our animals be if we didn't pursue knowledge about rabies, DM, cancer, and a host of other maladies. If I had cancer [and by the way, I was diagnosed with breast cancer five years ago in February] -- I'd be more than happy to cooperate in a research undertaking, and I've done so. Maybe we need to do some research. How many medical researchers "poke, cut, burn the 'free' dogs and cats" they get? Perhaps we need a regulatory agency that mandates acceptable protocols for research? It's a difficult issue. On one hand, I shrink from the thought of any senscient creature being "subjected" to research. On the other hand, humans and animals share a symbiotic relationship -- I don't think research has to be inherently cruel. Let's go after the poseurs -- the wannabes -- But let's use our intellects. Burning a serious researcher's car; shooting someone in his own kitchen -- if we go there, we're no better than they are. And Dawn -- You KNOW I'm on the dogs' side. Fran Henry ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2008. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================