Yeppers...little boy babies suffer unwanted and un needed pain from circumcision. Isn't it a cosmetic operation? We've allowed racial profiling in dogs, we're stopping ear cropping in dogs...so why not move to the human side of the argument? Let's ban circumcision in boy babies and at the same time...let's make aggressive men who attack others wear leashes and muzzles when they are out. I know this all sounds laughable but it is not when it comes to dogs...it riles our spirits and gets our blood boiling. What gives any legislator the right to suggest protecting (in their words) animals when they wouldn't dare attempt the same thing with humans. Let's ban nose rings and pierced ears. Cosmetic and painful. Geez Loueez...talk about a double standard. Paul Visit Rivendell on "Da Web" www.diablokp.com ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues ============================================================================