[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Hoader Raided*11 GSD's* outside of Baton Rogue UPDAT
- From: "pcooke212@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcooke212@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:22:00 GMT
I don't have a clue what your point is in regards to my or Paulette's posts.
Did you INTENTIONALLY break the law? If not, our posts have nothing to do with
your situation. I think you are confused as to what I or Paulette wrote.
Maybe Sally or Evan can assist in clarification. Sometimes we just plain need
lawyers and embroiderers. :-) :-)
Paula, 71 days and counting
-- gina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Royal T Shepherds <gina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hoader Raided*11 GSD's* outside of Baton Rogue UPDAT
How about people like myself in townships where, if you go to the townhall,
they will let you purchase as many dog licenses as you like. No one says there
is a 2 dog limit, they just take your money ,.smile and say, "Have a good
day". My real estate broker, who was informed specifically to look for areas
that allow multiple dogs, assured me that my 8 acre hobby farm was just that.
I went to the townhall, bought 5-10 dog licenses, depending on which year it
was, and believed I was in compliance with the law. It was at a town hall
meeting that I realised that the township rules were different than the
county. Also, that the county rules RULE! Some poor dog owner, not unlike
myself, received a complaint regarding the number of dogs on their property.
Since they didn't have a proper "county" kennel license, they were ordered to
decrease the number of dogs they owned within a specified amount of time, or
face daily fines until compliance. I
decided at that time to apply for a county kennel license, and found it VERY
difficult. Looking back, I don't know if I would have gone through the
hassle. While it's nice to know you are in compliance with all licensing
regulations, I find it very frightening to think about bringing about all that
attention to yourself, just to be turned down. I'm sure there are others in
areas like myself that have the same situations. My dogs were licensed, had
their rabies shots, and were well take care of. Yet still, because of rules
beyond my township, my dogs could still be considered illegal. The laws
sometimes are the reason for nonn-compliance, IMO.
Gina
ROYAL T SHEPHERDS
http://www.royaltshepherds.com
Home of: Ch Covy Tucker Hill v Royal T's Edsel,CD,NA,CGC,HIC,OFA h/e/t/c
Covy Tucker Hill's Marc Royal T,CD,CGC
Royal T's Wildwood Maggie May,TT
Stonekroft's Renaissance Royal T
----- Original Message ----
From: "cnnpmm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cnnpmm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pcooke212@xxxxxxxxxxx; showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:51:49 PM
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Hoader Raided*11 GSD's* outside of Baton Rogue UPDATE
"Paula Cooke" <pcooke212@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"... my post was about people PUTTING their dogs at risk by NOT following
the law, intentionally."
Paula, I know exactly what you're talking about... There's a long time
breeder with some very nice dogs who almost lost them due to his trying to
find a way to get around the county ordinances.
This breeder's dogs are well taken care of, but he's almost lost
them by not following the law. Several times, when the county came down on
him, he had to scrabble desperately to "hide" a lot of his dogs with friends
and family. When the "crisis" was over, he reclaimed the dogs.
Someone would complain and the whole cycle started again...
This last time, he was almost shut down for good. The stress was tremendous
on the breeder and the dogs. I really felt bad for the dogs.
Paulette McGuirt, GSDCA Member
Allemande German Shepherd Dogs
Qui Me Amat, Amat et Canem Meam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paula Cooke" <pcooke212@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:25 PM
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Hoader Raided*11 GSD's* outside of Baton Rogue
UPDATE
SALLY!!!!
I agree with you about your situation, but, my post was about people PUTTING
their dogs at risk by NOT following the law, intentionally.
That is NOT what you did. You followed the law; you WERE law-abiding.
You WERE following the law. Whatever would have happened if your husband
didn't find the paper has NOTHING to do with my post. It would NOT have
been a case of YOU NOT FOLLOWING THE LAW and putting your dogs at risk.
I don't know how else to explain my point!!
You are good; the people whose pets were confiscated were bad...they did NOT
follow the law; you did!!
I give up!!!
Paula, 71 days and counting
-- "sally" <dan-ann@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
but heaven knows what would have happened if my husband didn't keep every
scrap of paper.
Sally
www.embroiderybysally.org
new designs
____________________________________________________________
Visit New England and experience Old World charm. Click now!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/Ioyw6i4uGF3l2EPw0I1Kiab90eKU78NvdGGFc8g1ujQAVkhjpxrfoK/
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
