[ SHOWGSD-L ] HSUS gets caught in dirty tricks AGAIN!

  • From: Stormy Hope <Stormy435@xxxxxxx>
  • To: freelist LIST <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:43:16 -0800

http://www.consumerfreedom.com/

The Center for Consumer Freedom



Court Decision Bullhooks HSUS Executive



The lawsuit was originally filed in 2000 and alleged wrongdoing by  
circus elephant trainers, in violation of the Endangered Species Act.  
It was based on information provided by a former Ringling elephant  
trainer named Tom Rider. After leaving his job in 2000, Rider was paid  
by animal rights groups to crisscross the country testifying about the  
supposedly “bad” treatment of circus elephants. One of those groups  
was the Fund for Animals, which Markarian took over in 2002.

The Fund for Animals merged with HSUS in 2005 and became the Humane  
Society Legislative Fund, which Markarian continued to lead; he also  
became HSUS’s Executive Vice President. (If you find this confusing,  
you’re not alone: The Court referred to Markarian’s changing group  
affiliations with the catch-all “FFA/HSUS”)

In his ruling, Judge Emmit Sullivan found that the Fund for Animals  
paid Tom Rider $4,400 through Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, the law  
firm litigating its case. The Fund also paid Rider $1,000 directly,  
and funneled an additional $11,500 to him through the “Wildlife  
Advocacy Project” (WAP), a nonprofit group founded by some of the law  
firm’s attorneys.

All told, the cabal of plaintiff animal rights groups paid Rider at  
least $190,000. And Judge Sullivan wrote that this was his "sole  
source of income" as the case made its way through the federal court  
system.

Markarian’s testimony tried to muddle the pay-for-play implications,  
but the Court found it dubious at best. In his ruling, Judge Sullivan  
writes:

Beginning in December 2001 and continuing until at least the beginning  
of 2008, the organizational plaintiffs made payments to WAP for the  
purpose of funding Mr. Rider. While FFA/HSUS (Mr. Markarian) testified  
that it was not certain whether WAP used its “donations” for other  
purposes as well, this testimony is undermined by the documents  
underlying FFA/HSUS’s “donations,” which indicate that the money was  
specifically for use in connection with this litigation. FFA/HSUS’s  
testimony also is questionable given that in 2003, plaintiffs’  
counsel, Ms. Meyer, specifically sent an email to the representatives  
of the organizational plaintiffs, including Mr. Markarian, requesting  
funds to support Mr. Rider’s advocacy efforts regarding the elephants  
and the lawsuit, and expressly suggesting that the funds for Mr. Rider  
could be contributed to WAP so that they would be tax deductible.

HSUS also co-hosted a July 2005 fundraiser in California, along with  
the ASPCA and the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), for the explicit  
purpose of raising money to “wage this battle on behalf of the  
elephants.” As Judge Sullivan notes, “proceeds from the fundraiser  
(more than $13,000.00) were provided by AWI to WAP, which in turn  
disbursed those funds to Mr. Rider.”

It appears that Michael Markarian and a stampede of other animal  
rights leaders engaged in a conspiracy to funnel money to a witness in  
federal court—including help of their lawyers, who used a tax-exempt  
charity as their favorite “bag man.” But Judge Sullivan smelled the  
rat a mile away: “The Court finds that Mr. Rider is essentially a paid  
plaintiff and fact witness who is not credible, and therefore affords  
no weight to his testimony…. [T]he primary purpose [for the payments]  
is to keep Mr. Rider involved with the litigation…”

It remains to be seen whether the fallout from this stinging courtroom  
defeat will be significant. For starters, we’re recommending today  
that the IRS immediately suspend the Wildlife Advocacy Project’s tax- 
exempt status, and that HSUS suspend Markarian until it has made  
public a full accounting of Markarian’s use of funds from unsuspecting  
donors.



Yesterday, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit against the Ringling  
Bros. circus brought by a herd of animal activist groups, including  
the Fund for Animals (FFA), now a branch of the animal-rights “Humane  
Society” of the United States (HSUS). While the ruling was based on a  
legal technicality, the finer details indicate something sinister: a  
pay-to-play conspiracy involving HSUS executive Michael Markarian.  
Let’s take a look. [Click here for a copy of the ruling.]

  =
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2009.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] HSUS gets caught in dirty tricks AGAIN! - Stormy Hope