[ SHOWGSD-L ] Fwd: Pennsylvania SPCA: Stopping animal abuse or abusing power?
- From: cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, TheGSDShowcase <TheGSDShowcase@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, CHGSD <CHGermanShepherdShowDogsList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:25:21 +0000 (UTC)
If only the following story was a rare occurrence. Unfortunately it happens all
the time all across this country. More and more of these so called "shelters"
are being run and manned by Animal Rights fanatics.
Ginger Cleary - Rome, GA
www.rihadin.com
Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But
notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism
seeks equality in restraint and servitude. Alexis de Tocqueville
----- Forwarded Message -----
http://www.poconorecord.com:80/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081221/NEWS/812210331&emailAFriend=1
Pennsylvania SPCA: Stopping animal abuse or abusing power?
A dachshund waits to be adopted at the Pennsylvania SPCA in Philadelphia. David
Kidwell/Pocono Record Beth Brelje
By Beth Brelje
Pocono Record Writer
December 21, 2008
Miss Kittipie's owner, Linda Jones-Newman, watched in horror as her 13-year-old
quarter horse was killed by lethal injection under the direction of the
Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
Now, the agency is being accused in federal court of violating Jones-Newman's
civil rights.
Related Stories
• PSPCA director Howard Nelson addresses allegations
• Former employees report heart stick horrors
• Humane officers can carry guns; may get more power
• Who wants to run local pet shelter?
• PSPCA board member quits, criticizes CEO
• Pa. humane officer says PSPCA flouts jurisdiction laws
• SPCA reports no dogs with canine influenza
• Animal abuse official fired after one year
Links
• Special Report: Pennsylvania SPCA, Animal Abuse or Abuse of Power
Multimedia
• Chart: Animls Adopted vs. Put to Sleep at PSPCA Branches, 2007-08 (PDF
File)
• Document: PSPCA Statement to Pocono Record regarding criticisms (PDF
File)
The Pennsylvania case could set precedent across the United States for the way
SPCAs seize and destroy property without recourse for owners. The case will be
heard in Wilkes-Barre federal court. Litigants are awaiting a trial date. On
Jan. 9, 2006, three days before Miss Kittipie was killed, Linda and husband
Kevin Newman called their longtime vet, Ellen Johnson. She had been working
with the Newmans to identify the cause of a recent illness in horses at the
Thompson bed and breakfast business that featured horseback trail rides for
guests. The Newmans asked Johnson to put down two of their sick horses.
Another horse, Miss Kittipie, was a former racer who received an injection of
medicine in her injured knee when she was 2. The medicine caused the knee to
swell and it stayed that way. The horse managed normally with the knee for 11
years and even brought eight foals to term as a brood mare. Miss Kittipie had
been with the Newmans for nine months.
Johnson saw the knee and thought Miss Kittipie was crippled. She tried to
convince the Newmans to put her down. They would not agree. When she left the
farm Jan. 9, Johnson, who was later found to be working without a veterinary
license according to court papers, called the PSPCA.
Johnson later admitted, at a preliminary hearing in court, that Miss Kittipie's
condition was chronic rather than an emergency.
Three days later, with no warning, PSPCA humane police officer Chad Weaver
served a search warrant and issued a threat to the Newmans.
"He said, 'This can end right now. If you give me all your animals, this can
end.' He said they would drop the animal cruelty charges if I cooperated and
gave all my animals over," Kevin Newman said. The animals had food, water and
shelter. Newman did not agree to give them up.
This tactic is part of PSPCA humane officer training statewide.
"We were taught to intimidate people into giving their animals up. We were told
to tell them 'in lieu of charges, surrender your animals,'" said one former
PSPCA humane officer.
Some former officers say there was a quota.
"My Christmas bonus depended on how many animals I brought in," said former
PSPCA humane officer Tammy Kerr.
That's false, says Howard Nelson, PSPCA chief executive.
"There is no such quota. The majority of our cases are resolved by leaving the
animals in place with some education," he said.
Kevin Newman says that without discussion and with no opportunity to get
another vet's opinion, humane officers walked Miss Kittipie out of her stall
the day of the raid and instructed Johnson to kill her, right in front of the
owners.
"I was really hurt. She was a sweet horse," Newman said.
Abuse of power?
The lawsuit brought by Linda Jones-Newman accuses the PSPCA of violating her
civil rights by abusing its authority.
It says humane police officers, acting as agents of the state, or acting under
the color of law, seized property without notice and did not allow the Newmans
an opportunity for defense.
"They took property and destroyed it and permanently deprived them of it,
without giving the Newmans an opportunity for a hearing," said Stroudsburg
attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, who represents Jones-Newman.
"This theory that humane officers have all this authority not true. There are
all kinds of checks and balances," countered Nelson.
PSPCA humane officers take photos and video of evidence at the scene. They also
document an animal's condition during a medical evaluation.
After killing Miss Kittipie, the PSPCA humane officers were not done. They
loaded up many animals: six ducks, two guinea hens, 15 chickens, seven geese,
one parakeet, four cats, five dogs, five pigmy goats, one mini pony, two mini
donkeys, two llamas, one miniature cow, three sheep, 16 horses and one grade
pony. The seized animals became evidence. Some of the evidence was destroyed.
The miniature cow was later killed by the PSPCA, which claimed it was
dehydrated.
Humane officers also removed a macaw from the house in the middle of winter and
left the tropical bird in a cold vehicle for hours during the seizure,
according to Kevin Newman.
True to his word — since the animals were not given up freely — Weaver
charged Linda Jones-Newman with 25 counts of animal cruelty and deprivation and
Kevin Newman with two counts.
A judge later dismissed all charges against Linda and one against Kevin. He
paid $75 in a total fines for faulty sanitary conditions of four dogs. The
PSPCA was ordered to give the animals back.
If they had been found guilty, the Newmans would have been forced to pay the
PSPCA about $56,000 for the care of their animals by the agency and other
foster homes. They also would have had to pay for the cost of the destruction
of any animals the PSPCA deemed sick under Pennsylvania cruelty to animals law.
"The Newmans were running a rescue. They were taking animals in bad shape and
trying to rehabilitate them. The PSPCA made a decision that some animals could
not be rehabilitated," said attorney Fitzgerald.
'Deplorable condition'
Some of the animals that lived through the ordeal were returned from the PSPCA
in deplorable condition, according to Newman. The dogs and cats had fleas, ear
mites and hair so matted that it had to be cut.
A tricolor Australian shepherd's white fur was stained yellow from months of
living in the PSPCA's urine-soaked cage.
"He was lying in urine when we went to get them," Newman said.
"Linda Jones was found not guilty of cruelty to animals on all counts. If not
guilty of cruelty, why did they kill the animals?" Fitzgerald said.
Publicity for this and other high-profile seizures boosts PSPCA donations while
simultaneously smearing the reputation of animal owners.
"After this happened I was afraid to leave my farm. I thought they would come
back. Now people look at me like I'm the animal killer. Everybody thinks they
(PSPCA) are God's gift to animals. They kill most of the animals that they have
in their shelters and the ones they confiscate," Newman claimed.
Testimony given in court is considered credible when coming from PSPCA officers
because they are supposed to be animal experts. They also have total control
over evidence — animals — that are alive and can change over time.
In the Newman case, humane officers made life-and-death decisions about animals
first and prosecuted later.
"They claimed the animal was in dire straights after the fact," Fitzgerald
said.
Animals as evidence
Live evidence kept in storage cages for months and sometimes years while court
cases drag on cannot be adopted out. It would seem to create a storage problem
at the crowded shelters.
"It is the same process the police go through when they suspect a crime. In any
search warrant process, the evidence is always seized. You have to secure the
evidence to put on your case. The difference with a living, breathing animal is
that we have to provide care. We are required by law to do everything we can
for the animals so they are ready for adoption when we win the case," Nelson
said.
When confiscated animals die of sicknesses, the blame is often allocated to the
allegedly abusive owner, even after the animals have been in PSPCA care long
enough to develop new illnesses.
Half of the cats seized in a Venengo County case died under PSPCA care. (The
humane officer's authority to have animals surrendered was challenged in court
in that case and a judge ruled in favor of the PSPCA).
The PSPCA made its case in a statement to the Pocono Record:
"When animals are seized as evidence, they are just that — evidence for the
case. Until a judge makes a determination of guilt in the case, the animals are
still property of the defense. We cannot adopt the animals, but we can make a
determination, with veterinary guidance, to euthanize suffering animals."
Animals that don't die in PSPCA custody can be penned up so long that they go
stir crazy.
Once an animal's behavior is negatively affected, it may likely be considered
not adoptable and become marked for death row.
Animals cleared for adoption pay their own way. They are not adopted out until
a new owner gives a cash donation to the PSPCA.
__._,_.___
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2008. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
