[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Environmental tobacco smoke and canine urinary cotinine level
- From: "Peggy" <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <dan-ann@xxxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:50:25 -0400
yup. and i don't believe a word of it.
simple solution...if someone's smoking bothers you,
either move away or ask them to please move away.
but banning smoking is nuts. why are the rights of non-smokers worth more
than those of smokers?
Besides, smokers pay such high taxes to indulge our little vice...y'all
ought to be thanking us.
Peggy
----- Original Message -----
From: "sally" <dan-ann@xxxxxxxx>
> peggy
> haven't you heard of second hand smoke ?
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
