This was not a "legal" Closed Session if it was dealing with where to
host the National....not according to
the P & P Manual at least....and where does it state that a Board
member cannot tell you how they voted?
Besides....this Board member just told me he was against the National
going back to St. Louis...not HOW
he voted if that detail means that much to you............<G>
Either way....I cannot find where it states that a Board member is not
allowed to tell you how they voted????
Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.marhaven.com
From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Redacted sender
"ELG440" for DMARC
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 5:12 PM
To: showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Clarify...: Boards, Nationals, Futurities and
mind sets.......
I guess we could ask each board member.
But, the pending charges are that a board member said something that
happened in a closed session.
A board member divulged someone outside the meeting owed her handler
money. It was not true, but the board member being charged now asked
her for the truth, and then was charged with saying what happened in
the closed session. The board member who made the false accusation
brought the charges.
So, whoever told Carolyn how they voted is also guilty of giving out
the information from the closed session.
I was also given information from two other board members as to what
happened.
The board may be out of control.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Evan
http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
http://www.dogshowjuniors.com/GSYRFindex.asp
http://asgardgermanshepherd.com/
In a message dated 9/8/2016 5:02:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I want to clarify my statement. At least ONE Board member told me
he did not vote to change the
National site back to Purina.
Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.marhaven.com
