good questions In a message dated 10/29/2013 10:36:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lindabankhead44@xxxxxxxxx writes: It is interesting reading all the posts on The Standard Change. What is COMPLETELY missing from the puzzle is WHY the advisory committee and BOD sent this to AKC. Why is the list discussing DNA and scientific theory when this should have been done PRIOR to our PC submitting. No wonder members are up in arms. An uneducated decision has us very skeptical. Advisory board who recommended .......... Chirp chirp chirp. Tell us WHY. Education not hype. ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in any post. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================