[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: CLUB ELECTIONS AND NATIONAL SECURITY
- From: Stormy Hope <Stormy435@xxxxxxx>
- To: BAERENTATZE312@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:17:38 -0700
Thank you all, I will make up my own mind about for whom to vote.
This is becoming hateful and it does influence me, but not in the way
it should be intended. Watching to see who can "play nice" in the
sand box, while disagreeing and being their 'own person" does a lot to
create the impressions of a good board member. If people who "favor"
a candidate, creates this atmosphere... that also speaks loudly of
those whom they support. This is all taken into account by more than
me, I am sure.
It's really smoky and nasty out, warm and humid. Since I won't work
the dogs, maybe I should read more of Vachss. Now HE can really rip a
new one out of LOTS of issues! Better go for something lighter <BG>
Stormy
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:05 PM, BAERENTATZE312@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> Arrogant? Absolutely not, it was an email sent to SIX people
> discussing
> whom they preferred as candidates. I believe it's still a free
> country and
> people can discuss their preferences even in a private club setting.
> Nothing wrong or arrogant with that… plenty of people have sent
> emails in support
> of their favorite candidate to this whole list of how many people?
> Would
> you call that arrogant on their part? I guess it's only arrogant
> if you
> weren't included on their preferred list eh Madam? What was most
> offensive
> was the fact that the original private email was 'leaked'. Which was
> then
> circulated in an email to you and eight others with the message:
> 'The following message has been sent to me. I felt it is in the best
> interests of all candidates to understand what you are up against
> and be
> forewarned that there are those wanting to influence the election.
> I wish you all
> well and success in your endeavor…'
>
> Hmmmm
> 'best interest of all candidates'… Interestingly it was not sent to
> ALL
> candidates, only nine candidates, and my guess is only those whom
> the sender
> preferred. Since you were first on the list you must be the
> favorite. How
> about that?
> 'forewarned that there are those wanting to influence the election.'
> Isn't
> that what politicking is all about, trying to influence people to
> vote for
> those you support? It's not like certain people have hundreds of
> votes to
> cast. Last time I looked I only got one ballot in the mail. Darn!
> Oh sorry about all those questions… not too many for you I hope.
> Have a super day; I know I've been enjoying it immensely.
> Best regards,
> Pat
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2008. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
