[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Bill Introduced Yet Again In U.S. House of Representatives

  • From: Ruth Scheubler <rightdogphoto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: DaList <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:07:32 -0800 (PST)

Lobbyists get paid for making things happen -- and they are paid well.
Ruth



________________________________
From: Carolyn Martello <marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Stormy435@xxxxxxx; showgsd-l List <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, March 11, 2011 9:04:27 AM
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ]  Bill Introduced Yet Again In U.S. House of 
Representatives

IN THE U.S.  HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES???!!!       A PUPPY BILL???!!!
I'm so THRILLED the problems in this Country are so small we can meddle with 
that............sigh



Carolyn    marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.Marhaven.com


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Stormy Hope To: showgsd-l List Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:23 PM
  Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] PIJAC Alert<>PUPS Bill Introduced Yet Again In U.S. 
House of Representatives



  PUPS Bill Introduced Yet Again In U.S. House of Representatives
  More Info

  ** Animal Welfare Act To Be Amended **

  The Issue.

  Legislation that has appeared in similar form over the last two terms  
  of Congress was introduced yet again in the House of Representatives,  
  this time with RepresentativeJim Gerlach (R-PA) as the lead sponsor.  
  The Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act (PUPS) - H.R. 835 - would  
  amend the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) to limit the existing exemption for  
  retailers and add substantive requirements to existing care standards  
  under the law.  As with past sponsors of this legislation, Rep.  
  Gerlach touted the need to close the â??Internet loopholeâ?? because, he  
  claims, â??large breeders have evaded federal animal welfare laws by  
  selling dogs on the Internet.â??

  The Impact.

  The â??retail pet storeâ?? exemption under the AWA was inserted when that  
  statute was first amended to regulate pet dealers 40 years ago, and it  
  has withstood both court challenges and legislative efforts to curtail  
  the exemption.  Subject to limited exceptions, persons who breed and  
  sell warm-blooded animals as pets at wholesale are required to be  
  licensed with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS),  
  while those selling such animals directly to the public (as retailers)  
  are not. Amendments to the law proposed in the PUPS bill seek to limit  
  the exemption as it pertains to â??high volumeâ?? breeders.  Although  
  proponents argue that the amendment is needed to regulate the sale of  
  puppies over the Internet, this bill would apply to breeders meeting  
  the â??high volume retail breederâ?? definition no matter how they sell  
  those dogs.

  Under PUPS, a high volume retail breeder is defined as any person  
  â??who, in commerce, for compensation or profit,

  (i) has an ownership interest in or custody of 1 or more breeding  
  female dogs; and

  (ii) sells or offers for sale, via any means of conveyance (including  
  the Internet, telephone, or newspaper), more than 50 of the offspring  
  of such breeding female dogs for use as pets in any 1-year period.â??

  A â??breeding female dogâ?? for purposes of the Act is defined as â??an  
  intact female dog aged 4 months or older.â?? The bill provides that  
  anyone qualifying as a high volume retail breeder is a dealer under  
  the AWA and explicitly states that the retail pet store exemption  
  under the Act does not apply to these people.

  In essence, this legislation is eliminating the retail pet store  
  exemption for anyone who breeds dogs and sells more than 50 of the  
  offspring.  None of the billâ??s provisions specifically address the  
  â??Internet loopholeâ?? per se. Persons who qualify as â??high volume retail  
  breedersâ?? will be required to become licensed with USDA, irrespective  
  of whether they sell even a single dog on the Internet, while those  
  who donâ??t meet the threshold will not be required to obtain a license  
  even if they sell all their dogs via the Internet.  Proponents of the  
  legislation argue that it is necessary because means of selling dogs  
  today did not even exist when the AWA was first enacted, and the  
  rationale for the retail pet store exemption does not apply to  
  Internet sales at all.  That exemption was placed into the Act because  
  the focus was on regulation of breeders who are not subject to public  
  exposure.  Those who buy pets, as well as members of the public  
  generally, routinely frequent retail stores and readily observe the  
  conditions under which the animals are kept.  Furthermore, pet stores  
  are often regulated under state law.  Since persons selling  
  exclusively through the internet donâ??t have facilities frequented by  
  the public and state laws regulating pet stores do not necessarily  
  apply to them, these individuals escape oversight altogether.

  This bill also amends requirements for exercise of dogs by anyone  
  licensed under the Act.  Dealers would be required to report on their  
  original license or renewal application the number of dogs exempted  
  from exercise pursuant to a veterinarianâ??s determination and USDA  
  would have to adopt new exercise standards that include the  
  requirement for all dogs at least 12 weeks of age (except female dogs  
  with unweaned puppies) to have daily exercise that allows the dog:

  (i) to move sufficiently to develop or maintain normal muscle tone and  
  mass as appropriate for the age, breed, sex, and reproductive status  
  of the dog; and

  (ii) the ability to achieve a running stride; and

  (iii) is not a forced activity (other than a forced activity used for  
  veterinary treatment) or other physical activity that is repetitive,  
  restrictive of other activities, solitary, and goal-oriented.

  The exercise area must:

  (i) be separate from the primary enclosure if the primary enclosure  
  does not provide sufficient space to achieve a running stride;

  (ii) have flooring that is sufficient to allow for the type of  
  activity described above and is either solid flooring or, if nonsolid,  
  then it must be nonwire flooring that is safe for the breed, size, and  
  age of the dog, is free from protruding sharp edges; and is designed  
  so that the paw of the dog is unable to extend through or become  
  caught in the flooring;

  (iii) be cleaned at least once each day;

  (iv) be free of infestation by pests or vermin; and

  (v) must designed in a manner to prevent escape of the dogs.

  These exercise requirements would not be applicable to any particular  
  dog if a licensed veterinarian has determined that such exercise is  
  inappropriate due to the health, condition or wellbeing of the dog.  
  Unless the condition is permanent, it would have to be reviewed by the  
  veterinarian at least once every 30 days.

  When introduced in the last Congress, this legislation had companion  
  bills in both houses of Congress.  At this time, no Senate version of  
  the bill has yet been introduced.

  PIJAC Position.

  PIJAC has for many years condemned substandard facilities and has  
  worked with USDA to ensure effective enforcement of the AWA.  In fact,  
  PIJAC has supported legislation to strengthen the authority of USDA to  
  enforce the Act against unlicensed breeders who are required to be  
  licensed under the Act.  However, the AWA was never intended to apply  
  to non-commercial breeders and PIJAC has not supported expansion of  
  the Act to apply to such breeders.  Nor was the Act ever intended to  
  apply to traditional retail pet stores and PIJAC would oppose  
  expansion of the AWA to apply to such stores.

  Recommended Action.

  H.R. 835 was assigned to the House Committee on Agriculture in the  
  House of Representatives and a list of that committee membership may  
  be obtained by clicking here.  Individuals may also easily contact  
  their Congressional representatives directly through PIJACâ??s  
  Legislative Action Center on the Government Affairs page of the PIJAC  
  website.

  This bill has not yet been scheduled for a hearing. PIJAC will be  
  posting revised PetAlerts on the Breaking News page of its website to  
  advise members of any change in status and to recommend appropriate  
  action.  PIJAC will also issue a new PetAlert if and when a companion  
  to this bill is introduced in the Senate.  You are encouraged to check  
  the PIJAC website regularly for additional information.  Those having  
  questions or concerns about this legislation should contact PIJACâ??s  
  Michael Maddox via email at michael@xxxxxxxxx by phone at 202-452-1525.


  If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.





===========================================================================POST 
is Copyrighted 2011.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 


Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and its 
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in 
any 
post.

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER 
OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF 
ALL 
PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A 
VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. 


For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org  
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
===========================================================================


      
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2011.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and its 
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in 
any post.

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org  
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================

Other related posts: