[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Bi-Color
- From: Vontan@xxxxxxx
- To: showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:35:26 EST
In a message dated 12/28/2004 10:25:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
CherlynGSD@xxxxxxx writes:
> OK, I've always wondered...where do you draw the line between a very dark
> black and tan and a bi-color. I've had some people say "no tan on the face
> or chest at all" and others say "a little tan on the cheeks is still a
> bi-color". Which way is it??
I can't answer that, (although I suspect a bi wouldn't have tan on the
cheeks)... but what about people who have what they call a black but the black
has a
some tan on his toes and hocks. Seems to me that a dog who is truely a black
dog with a double recessive couldn't have tan of any amount...or could he??
Then also a black with a splash of white on the chest, this would be different
than the tan, right? I've never had a black dog and don't aspire to, this is
just something I've wondered about.
Yvonne
www.creekvue.com
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2004. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
