[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: BAD.... illustrated standard

  • From: "frank fasano" <f.fasano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <marhaven@xxxxxxx>, <almanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <EKOLAN1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:57:18 -0500

No one wants or needs four thousand opinions BUT WE SHOULD GET MEMBERSHIP
FEED BACK- This was to have happened by putting the standard in the secure
site on the web-oops what happened- well lets not ignore the problem or the
error but correct the problem- the membership is paying for the project they
should have a chance to see it and make comments before it is forced on
them- while we cannot possibly please everyone- hopefully we could come to a
consensus-it might delay the issue by as much as six months -so what-I don't
see any harm in that-Kris
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carolyn" <marhaven@xxxxxxx>
To: <almanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <EKOLAN1@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:33 AM
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] BAD.... illustrated standard


>
> From: <almanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >I agree the illustrations in the current standard are
primitive,,,,,,however the
> >illustrations we saw in one of the previous versions did not depict a
proper
> >structure of our GSD at all !  They will have to have been improved
immensely before
> >it ever represents our breed to the best it can.............I was
thoroughly
> >disgusted with what i saw in the previous version.
> > I believe the new PROPOSED illustrated standard whenever finished and
not rushed to
> > beat a deadline, should be sent to the membership for a vote. Something
this
> > important should never be the decision of 18 board members. And while i
agree you
> > won't please everyone, you will at least get a majority vote on the
issue that will
> > be with us for years to come.  JMO> Amy Safdir
> > Almanya Shepherds> www.almanyagsd.com
>                ************************************************
> I hear all the suggestions as to what we [the membership] don't want done
but
> no one is saying how they want it done. Is it that you want new people
> handling the nis? And who is to say there will not be as many people
object to the
> way they do it. Do you want every new page that is revised to be put to a
vote
> of the entire membership? We are going to need a lot of money to do it
that
> way. Really I do not agree or disagree with the objections being raised
but
> along with those objections you must submit your plan as to how you want
it
> handled. I suspect if all the membership were to submit a plan we might
have 3000
> plans out of 4000 members. Really when you object also along with the
objection
> send your plan.   I mean this NOT in a sarcastic way who knows someone may
>  have a great idea that all 4000 of us will like.       Fred Migliore
>                 ************************************
> Well I sure don't have any suggestions how to please 4,000 people in a
diverse
> membership.........but I can suggest that if the new illustrated Standard
is no
> better than what we saw last time.......it is no improvement on what we
already
> have and therefore we should just save the money and leave it as it is!!!
> If we cannot improve it artistically......then we can wisely save our
money and
> leave it alone until that is possible.   We don't  "need a change for
changes sake".
> What is the harm in allowing Breeders and Judges and
Exhibitors....MEMBERS...
> to at least see the new improved version before it is put to a vote??
> This is one of the single biggest driving forces in our visual on our
Standard
> and our daily decisions, whether Judging, chosing pups or entering shows.
> RUSHING it through and forcing the Board to make an up or down vote on a
> mediocre or bad version will be the single biggest mistake we can allow as
an
> entire membership of 4,000.   WHY alienate a membership and waste the
money
> if it happens to be just mediocre or even bad??   I don't get it.....when
did we
> run out of TIME?     No time for the membership??
> GEEEEEZ.......even a space program has to be scrapped occasionally......
>
> Carolyn  marhaven@xxxxxxx
> www.marhaven.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
============================================================================
> POST is Copyrighted 2005.  All material remains the property of the
original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS
of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author
AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
>
> ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
>
> For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
>
============================================================================
>


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: