What makes you think performance folks don't breed :0) On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Evan Ginsburg <elg440@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Tedi raised a good point, I had not thought about. Most of the breeding > is done by the conformation people. We provide the performance dogs, and > few of the performance exhibitors breed litters. > > I am not sure what that means, or how it impacts entries, but if we > conformation people stop breeding litters, (which many have), were are the > puppies going to come from? I know when we get calls for puppies, we have > trouble finding anyone with litters in Southern California. > > Evan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cinosamgsd <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: tinky91147 <tinky91147@xxxxxxxxx>; David Fritsche < > d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: edwinx <edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Showlist <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 5:35 pm > Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Interesting Decline Conformation > > Conformation entries are on the decline in all breeds.....this is a > fact. All breed clubs/shows are folding left and right. There are many > causes which I think everyone has touched on, but the bottom line is that > people are just not breeding dogs any more. The big kennels are gone. The > breeders are gone. Conformation is primarily a place for breeders to > showcase their breeding stock. It is not something that the single pet > owner generally gets involved in and if they do they almost always bring a > single animal to a show and only do so periodically. Lose the breeders > and you lose the entries. > > Cindy > ------------------------------ > *From:* Terry Cochran <tinky91147@xxxxxxxxx> > *To:* David Fritsche <d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> > *Cc:* "edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx" <edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Showlist < > showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Sent:* Sunday, February 22, 2015 8:01 AM > *Subject:* [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Interesting Decline Conformation > > I use to think that until I photographed the Great Dane Specialty here > in Phoenix. Total entry 89. It was the same number of entries they had last > year. > > They were worried that I was a GSD photographer. Was I going to be hard > to get along with? Would I make their dog look awful? I am sad to say that > we do have a poor reputation among other dog fanciers. On the bight side, > one of the judges had been to our national and was proud of the fact that > he was mentored by Jim Moses. Was amazed at the size of our ring and said > he would have never been able to see he dogs being shown so far away. > > I asked the president of the club how many professional handlers there > were there and she told me three. > > Our entries are declining because we are a "Handlers Breed" if you want > to win you need a professional handler. We have done a very poor job of > bringing young folks into the group. The young families go to the German > ring where they have a better chance of winning handling their own dog. And > yes they are there in the German ring, and in the German training classes. > The American specialty ring will soon be a thing of the past as we die > out. We have young handlers but we are running out of young owners and > breeders. Is there a way to turn this around. I really don't think so. > > Things change, > > Terry > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Fritsche <d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I’ve stated my opinion on this before, but since it is a current > discussion, might as well refresh it. > > There are lots of reason advanced that are introspective and blame the > trends on us. Although we could do better and be more friendly and cook > better lunches and…. These are not the problem. The problem is cultural. > Our culture is changing. > > The modular family has declined over the past several decades and will > be extinct if trends continue. > Those families that do exist have far more draws on their time and > competition for their attention. There are graded activities for each > member of the family that keep the family car going 70 different direction > 8 nights a week. > > Sports and activities have changes also with far more active and > dangerous activities drawing attention. A dog show you say? How many people > will be eaten, will fall through the air without a parachute, will do 12 > flips in the air over a fire pit… ???? What, run around in a circle for a > few minutes and get pointed to? > > I love it, you love it but you have to understand the details yourself > and be able to set ringside as judge. Then it is exciting. Otherwise, for > the current culture – not so much. > > I still love it and do not want to change it and want to be able to get > out to more shows. But like many of my peers, I am older now and at some > point I have to make that mark in the sand: No more dogs. My ability to > handle them and care for them decreases and I do not want to leave a bunch > of dogs to themselves when I die – and that is an inevitability that is > slowly chasing me down. > Dave > > *From:* showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx > *Sent:* Saturday, February 21, 2015 9:31 AM > *To:* dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Interesting Decline Conformation > > So why ( if in fact ) are we slowly going the way of the dinosaur ? Dogs > are just as popular ( if not more so) in our society as they've ever been! > I still get chocked up when I see a guide dog, or a police dog taking down > the bad guy... Why is OUR sport suffering? Is it us? Not blaming, just > asking! Too many lurkers on this list! Give your opinion, join the > discussion, or start a new one! Stormy WILL protect you! Look at at all the > ridiculous things I post! Raiders moving back to LA.... God lets hope so ( > Sorry Zoe..lol) FB > > Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > *From: *Evan Ginsburg > *To: *freelist > *Sent: *February 21, 2015 at 8:07 AM > *Subject: *[ SHOWGSD-L ] Interesting Decline Conformation > > > those numbers do not report what is really happening to the core and life > blood of the Sport, Conformation. > > What do we do? Face the facts. Recognition of the problem with facts > is the first, easiest, and most obvious step. > > > > Linda brings to us a most interesting issue and study. I printed out > two lines from the post that set forth the real issue. > > There is a saying, GI, GO. It means, garbage in, garbage out. > > Here is the problem. If you start with the statement that the "life > blood of the Sport, Conformation", then you have created a problem not > based on fact. It is clear, Conformation is not the life blood of the > sport, any longer. Every other facet of dog shows is growing, except > Conformation. So, is it not time to stop clinging to the theory that the > part of the sport we on this List love, and keep saying it is the life > blood, when it is not? Maybe it used to be, but the figures tell us it is > not. > > Then, at the end the article says, "Face the facts". So, let's face the > facts. Conformation has become something less than the driving force for > dog shows. That is not a good thing, nor is it a bad thing. It is the > "fact" and we need to face it. > > It is true that we want it to be the "Life Blood", but wanting won't do > it. We love conformation, but the majority of dog show entries show us > that what we love is not what is the "life blood" of the sport. > > When we recognize the facts, we can figure out what to do about it. Do > we want to increase Conformation when the majority of dog show entries > don't desire that? Maybe so, but if we do that, we need to do it with the > understanding that we are pushing against the tide. There is nothing wrong > with "tilting at windmills", so long as you know the windmill is going to > win. > > Not that there is anything wrong with that, so long as you know what > the facts are. > > Evan > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > > > > >