If the GSDCA breeders stop breeding, performance may go on. But there would be no need of a standard anymore since everyone would just breed what they want to breed. No standard, no goal. Eventually, would the GSD even look like a GSD - herding/working dog?? A proper structure and temperament, good health genetics are needed and therefore a standard and the Breeders of quality GSDs are needed. I always thought that the conformation shows were first established to showcase the breeding stock (none are altered). It can't be just a "pretty" show. But without Conformation shows, where would the GSD be in a few years? JMO Anne, GA Sent from Anne's iPad > On Feb 23, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Evan Ginsburg (Redacted sender "elg440@xxxxxxx" > for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tedi raised a good point, I had not thought about. Most of the breeding is > done by the conformation people. We provide the performance dogs, and few of > the performance exhibitors breed litters. > > I am not sure what that means, or how it impacts entries, but if we > conformation people stop breeding litters, (which many have), were are the > puppies going to come from? I know when we get calls for puppies, we have > trouble finding anyone with litters in Southern California. > > Evan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cinosamgsd <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: tinky91147 <tinky91147@xxxxxxxxx>; David Fritsche <d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: edwinx <edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Showlist <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 5:35 pm > Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Interesting Decline Conformation > > Conformation entries are on the decline in all breeds.....this is a fact. > All breed clubs/shows are folding left and right. There are many causes which > I think everyone has touched on, but the bottom line is that people are just > not breeding dogs any more. The big kennels are gone. The breeders are > gone. Conformation is primarily a place for breeders to showcase their > breeding stock. It is not something that the single pet owner generally gets > involved in and if they do they almost always bring a single animal to a show > and only do so periodically. Lose the breeders and you lose the entries. > > Cindy > From: Terry Cochran <tinky91147@xxxxxxxxx> > To: David Fritsche <d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx" <edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Showlist > <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 8:01 AM > Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Interesting Decline Conformation > > I use to think that until I photographed the Great Dane Specialty here in > Phoenix. Total entry 89. It was the same number of entries they had last > year. > > They were worried that I was a GSD photographer. Was I going to be hard to > get along with? Would I make their dog look awful? I am sad to say that we > do have a poor reputation among other dog fanciers. On the bight side, one of > the judges had been to our national and was proud of the fact that he was > mentored by Jim Moses. Was amazed at the size of our ring and said he would > have never been able to see he dogs being shown so far away. > > I asked the president of the club how many professional handlers there were > there and she told me three. > > Our entries are declining because we are a "Handlers Breed" if you want to > win you need a professional handler. We have done a very poor job of bringing > young folks into the group. The young families go to the German ring where > they have a better chance of winning handling their own dog. And yes they are > there in the German ring, and in the German training classes. > The American specialty ring will soon be a thing of the past as we die out. > We have young handlers but we are running out of young owners and breeders. > Is there a way to turn this around. I really don't think so. > > Things change, > > Terry > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Fritsche <d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > I’ve stated my opinion on this before, but since it is a current discussion, > might as well refresh it. > > There are lots of reason advanced that are introspective and blame the trends > on us. Although we could do better and be more friendly and cook better > lunches and…. These are not the problem. The problem is cultural. Our culture > is changing. > > The modular family has declined over the past several decades and will be > extinct if trends continue. > Those families that do exist have far more draws on their time and > competition for their attention. There are graded activities for each member > of the family that keep the family car going 70 different direction 8 nights > a week. > > Sports and activities have changes also with far more active and dangerous > activities drawing attention. A dog show you say? How many people will be > eaten, will fall through the air without a parachute, will do 12 flips in the > air over a fire pit… ???? What, run around in a circle for a few minutes and > get pointed to? > > I love it, you love it but you have to understand the details yourself and be > able to set ringside as judge. Then it is exciting. Otherwise, for the > current culture – not so much. > > I still love it and do not want to change it and want to be able to get out > to more shows. But like many of my peers, I am older now and at some point I > have to make that mark in the sand: No more dogs. My ability to handle them > and care for them decreases and I do not want to leave a bunch of dogs to > themselves when I die – and that is an inevitability that is slowly chasing > me down. > Dave > > From: showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:showgsd-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of edwinx@xxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 9:31 AM > To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Interesting Decline Conformation > > So why ( if in fact ) are we slowly going the way of the dinosaur ? Dogs are > just as popular ( if not more so) in our society as they've ever been! I > still get chocked up when I see a guide dog, or a police dog taking down the > bad guy... Why is OUR sport suffering? Is it us? Not blaming, just asking! > Too many lurkers on this list! Give your opinion, join the discussion, or > start a new one! Stormy WILL protect you! Look at at all the ridiculous > things I post! Raiders moving back to LA.... God lets hope so ( Sorry > Zoe..lol) FB > > Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: Evan Ginsburg > To: freelist > Sent: February 21, 2015 at 8:07 AM > Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Interesting Decline Conformation > > those numbers do not report what is really happening to the core and life > blood of the Sport, Conformation. > > What do we do? Face the facts. Recognition of the problem with facts is the > first, easiest, and most obvious step. > > > > Linda brings to us a most interesting issue and study. I printed out two > lines from the post that set forth the real issue. > > There is a saying, GI, GO. It means, garbage in, garbage out. > > Here is the problem. If you start with the statement that the "life blood of > the Sport, Conformation", then you have created a problem not based on fact. > It is clear, Conformation is not the life blood of the sport, any longer. > Every other facet of dog shows is growing, except Conformation. So, is it not > time to stop clinging to the theory that the part of the sport we on this > List love, and keep saying it is the life blood, when it is not? Maybe it > used to be, but the figures tell us it is not. > > Then, at the end the article says, "Face the facts". So, let's face the > facts. Conformation has become something less than the driving force for dog > shows. That is not a good thing, nor is it a bad thing. It is the "fact" and > we need to face it. > > It is true that we want it to be the "Life Blood", but wanting won't do it. > We love conformation, but the majority of dog show entries show us that what > we love is not what is the "life blood" of the sport. > > When we recognize the facts, we can figure out what to do about it. Do we > want to increase Conformation when the majority of dog show entries don't > desire that? Maybe so, but if we do that, we need to do it with the > understanding that we are pushing against the tide. There is nothing wrong > with "tilting at windmills", so long as you know the windmill is going to win. > > Not that there is anything wrong with that, so long as you know what the > facts are. > > Evan > > > > > > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > > > >