[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Agenda
- From: Fran Henry <fhenry1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lfossland@xxxxxxx>, <ELG440@xxxxxxx>, showgsd <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:05:00 -0700
Isn't it about time we had some answers??
Fran Henry
On 2/7/07 5:59 AM, "InquestGSD@xxxxxxx" <InquestGSD@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Me too, Dave. But when will that happen? 10 days later we are still waiting
> to hear about it. With the exception of Dania (and Thank You Dania).....the
> rest are MIA.
>
> So the speculations continue, and they help no one. Was it insurance
> problems or not? Was it lack of information or not? Was it lobbying from
> some board members or not? Was it the gifts or not? Was it they were not
> prepared or not? Could they had tabled this for later or not? Was it lack of
> backbone?
>
> The people with the answers are uncharacteristically quiet.
>
> 10 days.......if they had taken this time talking about voting Hunte in we
> would not be in this pickle. It seems disrespectful that giving him an
> answer was more pressing than talking to the members.
On 2/7/07 8:06 AM, "lewieb@xxxxxxx" <lewieb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> At the October Board Meeting our Membership Chair informed the Board of a
> Hearing concerning an applicant. This Hearing was to be done at the January
> Board Meeting, the applicant was invited to appear. This invitation was sent
> via mail, along with copies of the objections received. The Board knew of
> this Agenda Item in October, three months in advance.
[snip] . . .
>Everyone knew what is was about, who was coming and that they would be
>voting to reject or accept the member.
>
> So, Illeana, my response to you about Board members telling you they didn't
> know anything is like my favorite line from Cool Hand Luke, what you have is
> a failure to communicate. Or as Tennessee Williams might say, damn liars.
>
> Lew
On 2/7/07 9:33 AM, "Liane Fossland" <lfossland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why do the Board members converse with individuals rather than going on the
> list and getting it over with once and for all?
On 2/7/07 9:35 AM, "David Fritsche" <d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * If we assume that our convictions are rooted in absolute truth, then I
> agree, but the reason to listen to the reasoning of others it to check our
> convictions, adjust them as necessary and not be presumptive in the process.
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
