[ SHOWGSD-L ] Action Alert - AKC Judging policy change
- From: "Ginger Cleary" <cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Showgsd-L@Freelists. Org" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:30:30 -0400
Permission to crosspost....
-----Original Message-----
*****
It is indeed a very sad day when the AKC dictates where its judges may
contribute to the sport of dogs. Unfortunately the 800 lb gorilla has
muscled in and will continue to micro manage everyone's affairs. They
have very carefully couched this edict to avoid any legal repercussions
by stating that should you decide to judge in other venues you will not
be allowed to judge for the AKC. No one has the right to tell me where I
choose to offer my services or where I am able to advance my education
or register my dogs.
This being the case, all dual venue judges will most definitely have
decisions to make. I will also interject my concern here that with this
policy already passed has AKC BOD approval, the policy is in place and
most likely will not re-send it, per AKC BOD history. Given this
policy's existence, the door is now open for AKC to dictate your rights
to cross register your dogs. Be assured that the NON Cross Registration
policy has already been upheld in Federal District Court and AKC can
indeed institute the same policy in their registry.
Many of you as registrants of other venues, who may see this new
conflict of interest policy as having no affect on you, are sadly
mistaken. Many of you may not care or have any dog in the fight so to
speak, however you all need to voice your objections where ever you can
and also support the people who are directly affected by this outrageous
policy.
Many of the dual judges have one or 2 AKC Groups and are Best in Show
judges. These people have invested many thousands of dollars of their
own money and countless hours of time. The economics of their personal
situations may dictate giving up other venue judgeships. This decision
has nothing to do with any feeling that AKC is better any other venue,
but has more to do with sound business decisions.
Many up and coming AKC/dual judges, while having invested thousands of
dollars and countless hours of time, do have the same economic
considerations to weigh and do reside further down the food chain of AKC
judge seniority. I will relate my personal position as merely an
example. I am a fully vested UKC conformation judge as well as a UKC
earth working judge. I have only 2 regular AKC breeds and am well into
the process of obtaining 2 more provisional breeds.
The reality of my situation/decision is to me is a no" brainer", as I
shall illustrate. The AKC rule of thumb is that it takes $20-30,000 and
a good 10 years of time to hopefully be allowed to judge an entire
Group. I am 58 years old, if this is true by the time I'm 68 and have a
Group, I will still be virtually unemployable as an AKC judge.
You see the long and short of AKC Kennel Club hiring of judges is that
most hold clusters not individual shows. In order for these clubs to
break even they must employ judges who can judge MULTIPLE Groups, thus
get the most bang for the money spent. In addition as I move up the
"ranks", I cannot solicit assignments either as a provisional or as a
regular judge. So I must wait until a club invites me to judge. As a
result of this system it may take anywhere from 1-3 years or more for me
to have the required 5 provisional assignments and then I may not draw
either an entry or enough of an entry for my evaluation to count. I have
made my decision to reject my AKC judgeship if (and I do believe it
will) the policy stands. All the education in the world is useless
unless a judge is allowed to practice the art. I do not intend to reject
the support and kindness shown to me in other venues, by exhibitors as
well as hosting clubs.
I encourage all judges to unite in protest, even if you are not an AKC
judge. The repercussions of a policy such as this infringes on all of
your rights to pursue your personal aspirations. If AKC can institute
this policy then so can any other venue (mind you most will not). Now is
the time to protest not when it eventually may affect you, as frankly it
does now .you will loose a number of quality judges.
All judges regardless of the venue should join the SCJC (Senior
Conformation Judges Assoc.) and send letters of protest to
SCJA@xxxxxxx<mailto:SCJA@xxxxxxx> Let this organization know your
feelings and help them to fight this horrid policy. The SCJA does care
what all of you think, is mounting a fight and does accept all venue
judges into their membership and allow them to attend/participate in all
educational seminars.
By all means send your protest to UKC, let them know you will support
them in this fight; send your protest to any and all other organizations
whose dogs are also already in the fight! Please do not sit idly by and
think only of how this may impact you. Think how it is affecting the
future of the sport of dogs and trust that this AKC policy DOES affect
you now. Please cross post to any other organization or interested
individual you choose.
Pam Simmons,
UKC, ASCA, ARBA ,AKC Judge
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================
Other related posts:
- » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Action Alert - AKC Judging policy change
