Hi Charles. There is no big differences… but if the page is an ordinary multi column it is not easy to read it on an mobile device. If the meta tag: <meta name="viewport" content="width=430" /> is used in the header then the mobile device know the width and and could handle it properly. And do not use have pictures, in my own case I have only 1Mbit/sek on my mobile phone, not very much… Use Kompress to optimize the files! Sven E Olsson seeditmaxi@xxxxxxxxx http://seeditmaxi.cachefly.net/ feed://seeditmaxi.cachefly.net/rss/rss.xml Skype: seeditonskype On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:44:39, Charles Miller <chuckmiller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greetings - > > Pardon my ignorance, but I don't yet grasp the difference between these > mobile examples and an ordinary very narrow webpage. > > Perhaps my failure is that I haven't yet sent the folders to my smartphone > and my Android tablet. That may show different performance. > > Are these mobile ONLY templates? That is, are they NOT responsive designs > that adapt to different viewing devices? > > Trouble is, I have a working weekend. So my questions are perhaps premature > -- until I can look more closely. > > > I applaud seeing you active on our behalf. > > > Chuck M > > > On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:46 AM, Sven E Olsson <seeditmaxi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> Here is the example (SEEdit Site/Project): >> >> http://seeditmaxi.cachefly.net/downloads/mobileexample.zip >> Note that the css stuff is now in an standard Include file (not global). >> >> Sven E >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Post a Question ( new thread/subject ): seeditmaxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Answer a Question: Reply To Unsubscribe/Subscribe visit: http://seeditmaxi.cachefly.net/freelist.html