[sac-forum] Re: Cherry Rd. concerns

  • From: <starhopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:56:20 -0700 (MST)

> I understand that it is BLM land--a rancher has grazing rights to it. 
The BLM is down the street from my job--I'll inquire on Tuesday and post
the information here.
Jennifer Keller







 Let me be clear on this, the act in question is that no access to the
> "high water mark" is to be disturbed in any way. We are very much in the
> clear in this regard. We should also get in touch with the owner of the
> land to see if he as been informed of the erosion act. The sign in
> question did not appear as an "official government sign". I don't think
> anyone would be foolish enough to setup a scope on the bank of a wash
> anyway. At our meeting with the state inspectors it was indicated that
> construction of our infrastructure (fiber optics) would be watched very
> closely. When I design a route for the fiber it has to pass review by
> the inspectors. This keeps them busy, so I don't think that we pose any
> threat to the "indigenous life" that the act is designed to protect. My
> apology for raising the point, I did not intend to scare anyone from
> going out to observe. If we continue to use common sense then everything
> will be fine. I will still gather the information and pass it to the
> club. Cox is sending us to classes concerning the act (at $16,000 each).
> I have not seen anyone busted yet, just the stories that the instructor
> has passed on to us. And it is $25,000 a day until the wash is restored.
> DON'T PANIC...  We are all very responsible people and would not dream
> of causing the death of any thing that the government wants to protect.
> ( I know I could go off on them, but I will refrain).
>
> Clear Skies... and can anyone tell me the site for the Voyager III
> software?
>
>
> Andrew.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 9:57 AM
> Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Last Nights' Meeting.....
>
>
>> Thad, thanks for the post; especially about the Cherry Road "erosion
> control zone."  This topic came up when someone indicated there's a sign
> on a post, just before entering the gate, that has words to the effect
> this is an erosion control zone and cannot be used.  I remember seeing
> the post but not the sign the last time I was there, on September 20th,
> but didn't notice the sign.
>>
>> The gentleman that offered most information and will, I believe, check
> into what's going on is Andrew <whose last name escapes me>.  Jennifer
> spoke with him and chould have more information.  Apparently Andrew has
> something to do with Cox and digging cable trenches.  This puts him in a
> unique position to have an idea where to start investigating what is
> really happening.  Someone may have to take on this task once he gets
> back to us.
>>
>> I think Thad has the correct idea in not posting personal opinions
>> here
> but let me just say that I'm very disappointed in, apparently, loosing a
> very nice observing site.  Let's wait and see what the research and
> investigating turns up first.
>>
>> Clear skies,
>> aj
>>
>>
>> Thad Robosson wrote:
>>
>> > Hey All,
>> >
>> > But we also had some concerns pop up at the meeting.  Apparently,
>> some
> government entity has declared the Cherry Road site an "erosion control
> zone".  It's not clear exactly if this impacts our using the site, but a
> member (forgive me, I'm terrible with names.....:-(   ) volunteered to
> find out what is up with this.  The suspicion is that the wash on the
> West side of the site is the specific target of this.  Either way, until
> we find out, the fines can be $25,000.  I'll refrain from saying
> anything bad about certain Politico types here, but if you're interested
> in my opinion of said Politicos, ask me how I feel about them out of
> earshot of children!
>> >
>> >
>> > Thad




Other related posts: