[sac-forum] Re: Beyond the NGC is Beyond the Pale
- From: "Jack Jones" <spicastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:02:11 -0600
Actually you don't need the first sentence either. You could start off with
"If you have asked yourself..." and it would take right off from there. I
guess both sentences were vestiges from the NL article. Thx!
I have NLs going back to 1977 but have misplaced Mar, Apr, and Aug 99. If
Joe G. could bring those I'd appreciate it.
Jack
> Jack et all;
> Lost that e-mail with the drive.
> But have taken care of the sentence. It's gone!
> I am looking for 1999, march, april, may, june, july, august, september,
and december.
> I am also looking for march 2000
>
> Stan Clark
>
> >It was in a separate email to you. It's at the top of the Observing
Programs
> >page right after "This article discusses all SAC observing programs."
> >Delete the next sentence "The only exception is the 1000 New Objects
> >program." as it does not apply to the web page.
> >
> >I can bring all those issues to the meeting. Those were the work of the
> >amazing Laurie Larson if anyone remembers her.
> >
> >Jack
Other related posts:
