[sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...

  • From: <saguaroastro@xxxxxxx>
  • To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:15:41 -0500

Just need one more Board member to weigh in and it's done....


---- "Prause wrote: 
> Now that we have moved and are voting, I vote yes, that we spend the
> $300 for the 3 portajohns.  Mitch 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hanrahan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 7:00 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> 
> Mitch, are you moving we move on this or are you suggesting the actual
> movement?  I think you're suggesting the actual movement; therefore, I
> second the movement that we spend the $300 for port-a-johns.
> Many movements regarding future movements.
> 
> Does anyone see why we could not vote on this via e-mail?  I do not find
> any such information in the Constitution and Bylaws.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Prause, Mitchell F. (Spec Cas Risk Svcs UW Suppo)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:58 AM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> 
> OK, I'm game, I'll move that we spend the $300 so that we can vote on
> it.   Mitch  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Polakis
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:12 AM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> 
> ---- Rick Rotramel wrote: 
> > I seem to recall a change made recently to the SAC constitution about 
> > the Board being able to expend an unexpected expense with a majority 
> > vote of the Board.
> > 
> > I think the limit was less than $1000.00 for an expenditure without 
> > the vote of the entire club. Or was it $500.00?
> 
> 
> 
> Good catch, Rick.  I am looking at the SAC Constitution now.  It was
> last updated on March 26, 2010.  In Article VIII: Moneys and Properties,
> it reads, "In the event of unforeseen or emergency circumstances, in
> support of previously approved activities, the board may approve
> spending up to a maximum total of $500, with notification of the
> membership at the next club meeting."
> 
> So the Board may approve spending up to $500, and all that's required is
> a notification.
> 
> Now, are we allowed to do this vote on the SAC Board e-mail list?   If
> so, somebody should make a motion to spend the $300, and we can put if
> up for vote.
> 
> Tom
> 
> ************************************************************
> This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
> addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
> disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited.  If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
> ************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************
> This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of 
> addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged 
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, 
> disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited.  If you are 
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return 
> e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
> ************************************************************
> 
>

Other related posts: