Just need one more Board member to weigh in and it's done.... ---- "Prause wrote: > Now that we have moved and are voting, I vote yes, that we spend the > $300 for the 3 portajohns. Mitch > > -----Original Message----- > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hanrahan > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 7:00 PM > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes... > > Mitch, are you moving we move on this or are you suggesting the actual > movement? I think you're suggesting the actual movement; therefore, I > second the movement that we spend the $300 for port-a-johns. > Many movements regarding future movements. > > Does anyone see why we could not vote on this via e-mail? I do not find > any such information in the Constitution and Bylaws. > > Chris > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Prause, Mitchell F. (Spec Cas Risk Svcs UW Suppo) > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:58 AM > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes... > > OK, I'm game, I'll move that we spend the $300 so that we can vote on > it. Mitch > > -----Original Message----- > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Polakis > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:12 AM > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes... > > ---- Rick Rotramel wrote: > > I seem to recall a change made recently to the SAC constitution about > > the Board being able to expend an unexpected expense with a majority > > vote of the Board. > > > > I think the limit was less than $1000.00 for an expenditure without > > the vote of the entire club. Or was it $500.00? > > > > Good catch, Rick. I am looking at the SAC Constitution now. It was > last updated on March 26, 2010. In Article VIII: Moneys and Properties, > it reads, "In the event of unforeseen or emergency circumstances, in > support of previously approved activities, the board may approve > spending up to a maximum total of $500, with notification of the > membership at the next club meeting." > > So the Board may approve spending up to $500, and all that's required is > a notification. > > Now, are we allowed to do this vote on the SAC Board e-mail list? If > so, somebody should make a motion to spend the $300, and we can put if > up for vote. > > Tom > > ************************************************************ > This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of > addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, > disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies. > ************************************************************ > > > > ************************************************************ > This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of > addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, > disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return > e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies. > ************************************************************ > >