[sac-board] Re: FW: Re: 2002 Events
- From: jack.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:14:16 -0700
Good job Paul, and good job on the calendar. The Deep Sky dates we did not
discuss then, only the Parties and Mtgs. Nobody objected to May 24 for the
SP, and the 31st was the day after a mtg, so consensus was for the 24th.
Change if you want, I'm going to RTMC. Bring it up with the new Pres at the
next Bd Mtg, it's still early! Newsletters are corrected on the fly, that's
true, so woe if you pick up an old one to check a date - members must be
instructed to use the newest for the latest info as a rule, I'd say. Always
lots of typos, unforeseens, serendips, and flexes (and always will be, but
held to an extremely low level so quitcher bitchin). Case in point: the 20th
for the party is a mistake, it should have read Sat the 21st. Booboo, boo
hoo. Please correct (or pick some other time to your liking). Everybody
missed that one.
Jack
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AJ Crayon [SMTP:acrayon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:03 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: FW: Re: 2002 Events
>
>
> Paul, the May date, as were all dates for SAC events for 2002, was posted
> and
> discussed for a short time; then all respondants agreed to the dates
> supplied.
> Didn't you see these messages?
>
> The Deep Sky dates were posted, as above. But they originally came from
> me and
> posed a difficult decision. If Christmas was ignored then the 26th was
> the date;
> otherwise either put the meeting off until January or not have a meeting
> at all -
> neither of which I liked back then.
Other related posts:
