[sac-board] Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
- From: <rtejera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:19:02 -0400
Personally, I agree with Thad, It doesn't matter. I say we let EVAC do =
what EVAC wants, it's of no concern to us. As for those who have dual =
memberships, it is up to them if they wish to remain members of either =
club. Only they can make that decision. If EVAC wants to continue =
arguing over who has "rights to the term "All Arizona" let them. It's =
hard to have a fight without an opponent.
Let's take the High Road.
My 42.9460 Venezuelan Bolivares Worth
Telrad
-----Original Message-----
From: Thad Robosson [mailto:starstarcracker@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 10:58 AM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: [EVAC Cabinet 2005] All Arizona this or that
> Interesting...In fact, both were started by SAC! (I think.)
>
> As I remember it:
>
> EVAC took on "AASP" a couple/three years later after "AASP" annual
> occurrences. (I think.) A deal was made for EVAC to sponsor "AASP" so =
that
> SAC would not have to sponsor both "AASP" and "AAMM".
>
> Can anybody concur? We'll have to search the SAC newsletters for =
proof.
I have to ask, "Does any of this really matter?"
It's not hurting anyone for SAC and EVAC to share the "All-Arizona"=20
monicker.
I hardly think it's a problem, and I can't think of why we should be=20
concerned with it.
It's not a competition after all, it's supposed to be fun.
Any other thoughts?
Thad
Other related posts:
