[sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List

  • From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:09:01 -0700

To Brian and everyone else involved in this discussion.  I'd like to thank 
each and everyone of you for such good feed back and support.  One of the 
many traits of SAC that make it an enjoyable experience to be a part.

BTW, I checked out the changes and they look good.

Clear skies,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Workman, Brian (AZ76)" <brian.workman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:58 AM
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Change to SAC H400 List


My opinion hardly matters here, but I've logged both objects:

NGC 1750 is not much of an open cluster - very ho-hum

NGC 7814 is an interesting, pretty bright, edge on galaxy

Seems like NGC 7814 is a "better" object, interest-wise, so I concur
with your recommendation. (Besides, since I've logged them both, I've
still seen all of the H400 objects.


Other related posts: