Re: [PATCH] Implement timekeeping for rumprun/hw (x86)

  • From: Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx>
  • To: rumpkernel-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:38:38 +0000

oh, actually.

No need to expose everything that the original clock_subr.h exposes.

uint64_t dt_year? Well that's not going to suffer from y2k issues
anytime soon. Why is it unsigned anyway? Does counting start from
-bigbang or what? ;)

That was all lifted rather hurriedly from NetBSD, I'll clean it up a bit
more :-)

For whatever reason I thought clock_subr was going into bmk_core. Then I realized it would make no sense, and was about to point that out, then noticed it wasn't going into bmk_core, and forgot to point out that I don't really care about additional mess in the platform code. bmk_core is sort of the crown jewel, I'm very protective of it ;)

So, long story short, no cleanup necessary there (but if you already did it, no reason to undo it either).

Other related posts: