[rollei_list] Re: xenotar 2.8f vs planar 2.8f

  • From: "Jeffery Smith" <jls@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:15:36 -0500 (CDT)

I have both and cannot detect any difference. I think that in medium format, 
subtle differences between similar lenses are pretty hard to detect with any 
certainty. The Xenotar is usually cheaper and easier to find. So from a 
shooter's perspective, it's the logical choice.

Jeffery


----- Start Original Message -----
Sent: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:25:50 +0800
From: "Nelson Chan" <cchan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [rollei_list] xenotar 2.8f vs planar 2.8f

> Hi,
> 
> What is the opinion of the group regarding which is the better lens, the 
> xenotar 2.8f or the planar 2.8f?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Nelson
> 
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 
> 

----- End Original Message -----
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: