[rollei_list] Re: xenotar 2.8f vs planar 2.8f

  • From: Peter J Nebergall <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:37:04 -0500

Regarding older lenses (including my Cord's Xenar), after 5 decades,
isn't the lens performance a taphonomic issue (i.e. dependent on
individual preservation?)

Peter Nebergall 


On Thu, 11 May 2006 14:02:09 -0500 Jeffery Smith <jls@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jerry branded me a troll about 4 years ago when I asked the exact 
> same question. I thought that it was a completely legit question 
> (then and now), but apparently it is a "hook" question on this 
> forum.
> 
> By the way, I never bought a Rolleiflex with a Tessar because I was 
> reluctant to ask about the lens quality compared to the others.
> 
> Jeffery
> 
>

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: