f2 is hand7y indoors (concerts), night/evening as well as when using
with a Longar 1.4 (giving a 112mm/f2.8).
It's plenty sharp as well (Scheinder sent me a copy of the MTF's and
said from 2.8 and up it is basically identical to the 80/2.8 version,
but offers the 2.0 aperture at the expense of size and weight).
Cheers, Thor
On 13 May, 2006, at 0:07, Peter K. wrote:
Well, if you do I will provide you a tissue. :-)
The F2 is good, fast, large and sharp. But the 2.8 is the one to get. Unless of course you need an F2 aperture or want to impress someone.
On 5/12/06, Thor Legvold <tlegvold@xxxxxxx> wrote: I wouldn't sneeze at the f2 version either....
Thor
On 12 May, 2006, at 22:08, Peter K. wrote:
> Hi Rei,
>
> What a neat link. Now if I hada Rollei 6003 or 6008, I would love to
> find Xenotar 2.8 for it as from what I have read, it is the better of
> all the 80mm lenses specifically for the Rollei 600x. Hands down beats
> the Xenotar F2.
>
> Peter K
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
-- Peter K Ó¿Õ¬
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list