[rollei_list] Re: xenar test roll is back

  • From: daxelb@xxxxxxx
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:01:18 -0500

 Hey Richard, 

I defer to your (far) greater knowledge and I'd thought the same thing-- my 
lens is old and may not be as clean as it should be--but I've printed with two 
other lenses ( also old) that pretty much correspond with contrast of my lens. 
I'll certainly use your recommended flash light method and lord knows I've had 
that lens for over twenty-five years and I don't doubt that I will find the 
evidence you describe but I have used my friend's lens on old negs and gotten 
superior results-- not sharper just more contrasty than I was ever able to 
effect originally. I think, but wouldn't argue, that it is just an inherently 
more contrasty lens.
 Have your heard of this before? I guess my question is: are there variations 
among same (new) lenses? Or is consistency the non-hobgoblin of little lenses?

David 


 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, Feb 4, 2010 3:39 pm
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: xenar test roll is back


----- Original Message ----- From: <daxelb@xxxxxxx> 
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 10:39 AM 
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: xenar test roll is back 
 
 
 Hi, 
 
Another rub: what about the possible variations among (supposedly) exact same 
lenses? Has anybody found that to exist to a point where it is apparent? 
I had that experience with a Nikkor 50mm enlarging lens. A friend of mine has 
the same lens and it gets a full grade of improved contrast over my own. I 
occasionally borrow her lens when I have a really flat negative and I can get a 
beautiful print from a #4 filter where with my own lens the image would print 
too flat. 
 
David Baumbach 
 
    There should not be so much difference in contrast. I suggest checking both 
lenses for internal haze. Just shine a small flashlight through the lens, if 
there is any haze you will see it. Even a very small amount of haze will 
substantially reduce contrast. Most lenses are reasonably easy to get apart for 
cleaning. The haze forms on inside surfaces. I don't know the cause for certain 
but suspect it is a deposit from the anti-reflective paint in the lens cell. It 
forms inside sealed cells so I don't think its from evaporated lubricant. 
Whatever it is seems to come off with ordinary lens cleaner or alcohol. 
    Its very unlikely that the difference in these two lenses is caused by a 
variation in optical correction or even by differences in coating. It _is_ 
possible that its caused by scratches or "cleaning marks" which are very fine 
scratches, in the surface of one lens. These can also destroy contrast. The 
flashnight examination will also show them up pronto. 
 
-- 
Richard Knoppow 
Los Angeles, CA, USA 
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  
--- 
Rollei List 
 
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the 
subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org 
 
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the 
subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org 
 
- Online, searchable archives are available at 
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list 
 

 

Other related posts: