Thank you, Carlos & Jan. I accept Carlos' point that one can see a difference between prints from slides and negatives. And I also agree that a print from a slide never matches the experience of the slide itself. So if (and only if) people continue in the future to gather for slide projections, this would be a favorable and attractive medium. I'm personally happy with inkjet prints from color negatives for two reasons: One is that like Jan, I usually don't photograph brightly colored scenes, and thus prefer a gentler color palette. The other is a stereotype, in the US at least – that slide projection is an amateur camera club activity, while printing is an accepted medium for gallery exhibition and print collecting. As Carlos pointed out, however, a certain style can be realized best through scanning slides and printing them. So I do understand why some photographers are attached to slide film with this as their objective. Kirk > From: Jan.Decher@xxxxxxx > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: still shooting slides! So do I ! > Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:39:27 -0500 > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Kirk, > > I agree with most of what Carlos said although I am not as much a > "vivid color" fan as he is (maybe that's because I grew up in Germany > where even the fall colors are mostly pastels ;-)). > > As for slide shows, I think it's the same with all "performances" you > have to do a better than average job to gather people into a room and > "force them" to watch your images. Almost every good camera book in > the past had suggestions how to do this well (for example Franz > Pangerl's 1970 "Rollei 35" booklet I got in the mail yesterday). > > I am convinced you could still draw a crowd, if someone was offering > professional slide shows in this country a la Walter Benser - who > after WWII used two powerful Leitz Pradovit projectors with two huge > screens and a carefully crafted script to promote the Leica with his > excellent photos all over the World. > > Masters of the medium format slide show are Helfried & Renate Weyer. > Among others they use Rolleiflex 600x cameras and 6 Hasselblad > projectors on a panorama screen for projection. > Their website is here: http://www.helfried-weyer.de/ > willkommen.html (sorry, German only). > Their current slide show itinerary in Germany is here: http:// > www.helfried-weyer.de/willkommen.html > > (I assume many on this list own Helfried's beautiful coffee table > book "Rollei fototechnic" which promotes the Rollei 6008 system. > > The brilliance of well-projected medium format slides is just > amazing. I doubt that even high end digital projectors like the Leica > Pradovit 1200 ($13,999 - discontinued!) can match the projected > analog image. > Jan > > > On Nov 8, 2011, at 1:09 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote: > > From: Kirk Thompson <thompsonkirk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: still shooting slides! So do I ! > > Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:35:08 -0800 > > I'm curious (and I really mean curious – not wanting to start an > > argument, but really wanting to know): Why not change to color > > negative film? The color palette is gentler, exposure is not as > > problematic, and above all, one needn't confine people to a room > > with a slide projector, which is difficult now that they're > > accustomed to the Internet. One can go ahead and make a fine print > > either way, slide or negative, via digital printing – which is how > > most prints for gallery exhibitions are made now. > > What would be the advantages now for slides over negatives, if the > > outcome is to be a print or a Web post? > > Kirk > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list >