[rollei_list] Re: [rolleiusers] Rollei 35 XF
- From: "Douglas Shea" <dshea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:30:39 -0600
I briefly owned a 35XF; seduced by the lens but the camera was garbage --
something like a whore with a heart of gold.
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carlos Manuel Freaza
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 2:22 PM
To: rolleiusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [rolleiusers] Rollei 35 XF
Thanks Bob and Phil, I appreciate your commentaries
very much. The camera was offered to me costing $85,
it is expensive according Bob's comments. BTW the
Sonnar lens interested me, but I had doubts about the
automatic exposure system, since the camera can't be
used manual I don't buy it, the AE often could require
adjustment considering the camera age and the
Singapore QC. Thanks again.
All the best
Carlos
--- Phil Swango <paswango@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> Thanks for the comments, Bob. I know a lot of
> people don't like this
> camera. Mine has worked well and takes good
> pictures. I've seen
> quite a few in thrift shops and such that were not
> in good shape. For
> some reason mine has been reliable. I'd probably
> pay up to $30-40 for
> a nice one.
>
> On 7/20/05, Bob Shell <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Carlos
> Manuel Freaza wrote:
> >
> > > It was offered to me for a reasonable price a
> Rollei
> > > 35 XF Sonnar 2.3/40. I know that this camera is
> > > slightly larger than the classical Rollei 35, it
> uses
> > > a mercury battery px 625 that could be replaced
> by a
> > > LR9 or similar, the camera has a good shape but
> I know
> > > nothing about it regarding its behavior in
> practical
> > > use. If possible, I'd like opinions about it.
> > > Thanks in advance.-
> > >
> >
> > I just responded on the other list. Here is what
> I said.
> >
> > > I guess it depends on what you think is a
> reasonable price. If you
> > > are saying $ 10 or so, yes, that's a reasonable
> price. If more, not a
> > > reasonable price. This camera tends to be
> troublesome and very
> > > unreliable. When they were closed out after
> production ceased you
> > > could buy them brand new for under $ 50. It has
> auto exposure only,
> > > no manual override. The lens is good, but the
> rest is not so good.
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Phil Swango
> 307 Aliso Dr SE
> Albuquerque, NM 87108
> 505-262-4085
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rolleiusers/
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
> to:
> rolleiusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
