[rollei_list] Re: [rolleiusers] Argomania
- From: David Sadowski <dsadowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:02:50 -0600
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> David,
>
> No, you suggest erroneously! My 828 negatives are considerably thinner
> than my 35mm negs
> taken in the same time frame. My 828 negs were taken with a Kodak Bantam
> Special a Kodak
> Medalist and a Rolleiflex. (Both the latter with adapters made by my cousin)
>
> I do know the difference between roll film stock and cine film stock.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
FYI, I made no reference to cine film in any of my posts. You must be
responding to someone else's post.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
