Roger: The 2.8F (K7 F) uses the Bay III created for the 2.8 B (K7 B) with the Biometar 2.8/80 in 1952 and then you have: BI= 28mm; BII= 34mm; BIII= 38mm. Rolleiflex 2.8/80 lens TLR 6x6 cameras use shutters 0 size and Rolleiflex and Rolleicord 3.5/75 lens (BI and BII) TLR 6x6 cameras use shutters 00 size and then the shutters are different. Carlos 2010/11/4 Roger Beverage <victoryswing@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Likely because they used the same shutter and shroud as the 2.8 F which lens > is, of course, larger in diameter. My 3.5 E is also bay II. > > Roger > > >> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:07:26 -0400 >> From: ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To: ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: rollei_list Digest V6 #285 >> >> rollei_list Digest Tue, 02 Nov 2010 Volume: 06 Issue: 285 >> >> In This Issue: >> [rollei_list] Bayonet II >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [rollei_list] Bayonet II >> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:08:08 -0500 (CDT) >> >> According to my measurement, the diameter of the front element of the >> 75mm Tessar on my Rollei T is 25mm. The Rolleiflex T takes bayonet >> I accessories. I then measured the diameter of the front element of >> the 75mm Planar on my Rolleiflex 3.5F. It also is 25mm in >> diameter. The Rolleiflex 3.5F takes Bayonet II accessories. This >> leads me to wonder why F&H created bayonet II in the first place. >> Anyone know? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list