Jim, OK, please accept my invitation for you to post photos. There, I did it. Jerry jim d wrote: > Hi > Any chance someone would be willing to give me an > invitation so I could post a picture or 2 from my > Rollei 6008AF on the Rollei Gallery? Thanks in > advance for your consideration. > Jim jasdyh@xxxxxxxxx > > --- FreeLists Mailing List Manager > <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > rollei_list Digest Fri, 13 Jan 2006 Volume: 02 > > Issue: 013 > > > > In This Issue: > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film > > camera an > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film > > camera an > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film > > camera an > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film > > camera an > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film > > camera an > > [rollei_list] OT: Film and digital, WAS something > > about Niko > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film > > camera an > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Film and digital, WAS > > something about > > [rollei_list] Friday FS > > [rollei_list] ROLLEI GOODIES FOR SALE-- JANUARY > > 13, 2006 > > [rollei_list] Items FS 13 JAN 2006 > > [rollei_list] ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS: > > PLEASE READ! > > [rollei_list] Photos from Buenos Aires I > > [rollei_list] Rolleikin? > > [rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin? > > [rollei_list] Good laugh > > [rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin? > > [rollei_list] Re: Good laugh > > [rollei_list] Sad news from Agfaphoto > > [rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin? > > [rollei_list] Re: Good laugh > > [rollei_list] OT: Bob Shell's Puns > > [rollei_list] Re: OT: Bob Shell's Puns > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Royo?= > > <jvroyo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further > > reduce film camera and accessor > > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:03:09 +0100 > > > > All of us know what the advantages of digital are > > but, what are we = > > missing > > when moving to digital? > > > > In my opinion, some of the most annoying issues, at > > least in average = > > digital > > cameras, are: deficient control of exposure and very > > slow response of = > > the > > shutter. > > > > Jos=E9 Royo. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:02:08 +0000 > > From: James Davis <jamesd@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further > > reduce film camera and > > > > José Royo wrote: > > > All of us know what the advantages of digital are > > but, what are we missing > > > when moving to digital? > > > > > > In my opinion, some of the most annoying issues, > > at least in average digital > > > cameras, are: deficient control of exposure and > > very slow response of the > > > shutter. > > > > My sister bought a Ricoh R2 last month. I was quite > > impressed that it > > had a shutter response of 0.06s (for a POS camera). > > > > I don't see what you mean about deficient control of > > exposure though. > > > > James > > > > -- > > http://www.freecharity.org.uk/ - Free hosting for > > charities > > http://jamesd.ukgeeks.co.uk/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Royo?= > > <jvroyo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further > > reduce film camera and accessor > > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:14:39 +0100 > > > > I meant that the range of aperture and speed numbers > > are scarce. > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre > > de James Davis > > Enviado el: viernes, 13 de enero de 2006 11:02 > > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further > > reduce film camera and > > accessories production > > > > Jos=E9 Royo wrote: > > > All of us know what the advantages of digital are > > but, what are we = > > missing > > > when moving to digital? > > >=20 > > > In my opinion, some of the most annoying issues, > > at least in average > > digital > > > cameras, are: deficient control of exposure and > > very slow response of = > > the > > > shutter. > > > > My sister bought a Ricoh R2 last month. I was quite > > impressed that it > > had a shutter response of 0.06s (for a POS camera). > > > > I don't see what you mean about deficient control of > > exposure though. > > > > James > > > > --=20 > > http://www.freecharity.org.uk/ - Free hosting for > > charities > > http://jamesd.ukgeeks.co.uk/ > > --- > > Rollei List > > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > with 'subscribe'=20 > > in the subject field OR by logging into > > www.freelists.org > > > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > with=20 > > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging > > into www.freelists.org > > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:31:53 +0000 > > From: James Davis <jamesd@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further > > reduce film camera and > > > > José Royo wrote: > > > I meant that the range of aperture and speed > > numbers are scarce. > > > > My D70 has a wider range of aperture and shutter > > speeds than my > > Rolleiflex (save that the D70 has no bulb setting) > > and I find neither > > particularly restrictive. If you mean consumer POS > > type cameras, I don't > > think they are any more restrictive than a > > comparable film camera. > > > > James > > > > -- > > http://www.freecharity.org.uk/ - Free hosting for > > charities > > http://jamesd.ukgeeks.co.uk/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:30:22 -0600 > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further > > reduce film camera and accessor > > From: Peter J Nebergall <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx> > > > > I believe its time will be short. Something else > > will become more hip... > > Those who would be 'with it" must always be > > scurrying toward the next > > hot item... > > > === message truncated === > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 01/13/2006 --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list