[rollei_list] Re: rollei_list Digest V2 #13

  • From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:12:34 -0800

Jim,

OK, please accept my invitation for you to post photos.

There, I did it.

Jerry

jim d wrote:

> Hi
> Any chance someone would be willing to give me an
> invitation so I could post a picture or 2 from my
> Rollei 6008AF on the Rollei Gallery?  Thanks in
> advance for your consideration.
> Jim  jasdyh@xxxxxxxxx
>
> --- FreeLists Mailing List Manager
> <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > rollei_list Digest    Fri, 13 Jan 2006        Volume: 02
> > Issue: 013
> >
> > In This Issue:
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film
> > camera an
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film
> > camera an
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film
> > camera an
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film
> > camera an
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film
> > camera an
> >               [rollei_list] OT: Film and digital, WAS something
> > about Niko
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further reduce film
> > camera an
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Film and digital, WAS
> > something about
> >               [rollei_list] Friday FS
> >               [rollei_list] ROLLEI GOODIES FOR SALE-- JANUARY
> > 13, 2006
> >               [rollei_list] Items FS 13 JAN 2006
> >               [rollei_list] ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS:
> > PLEASE READ!
> >               [rollei_list] Photos from Buenos Aires I
> >               [rollei_list] Rolleikin?
> >               [rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin?
> >               [rollei_list] Good laugh
> >               [rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin?
> >               [rollei_list] Re: Good laugh
> >               [rollei_list] Sad news from Agfaphoto
> >               [rollei_list] Re: Rolleikin?
> >               [rollei_list] Re: Good laugh
> >               [rollei_list] OT: Bob Shell's Puns
> >               [rollei_list] Re: OT: Bob Shell's Puns
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Royo?=
> > <jvroyo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further
> > reduce film camera and accessor
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:03:09 +0100
> >
> > All of us know what the advantages of digital are
> > but, what are we =
> > missing
> > when moving to digital?
> >
> > In my opinion, some of the most annoying issues, at
> > least in average =
> > digital
> > cameras, are: deficient control of exposure and very
> > slow response of =
> > the
> > shutter.
> >
> > Jos=E9 Royo.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:02:08 +0000
> > From: James Davis <jamesd@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further
> > reduce film camera and
> >
> > José Royo wrote:
> > > All of us know what the advantages of digital are
> > but, what are we missing
> > > when moving to digital?
> > >
> > > In my opinion, some of the most annoying issues,
> > at least in average digital
> > > cameras, are: deficient control of exposure and
> > very slow response of the
> > > shutter.
> >
> > My sister bought a Ricoh R2 last month. I was quite
> > impressed that it
> > had a shutter response of 0.06s (for a POS camera).
> >
> > I don't see what you mean about deficient control of
> > exposure though.
> >
> > James
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freecharity.org.uk/ - Free hosting for
> > charities
> > http://jamesd.ukgeeks.co.uk/
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Royo?=
> > <jvroyo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further
> > reduce film camera and accessor
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:14:39 +0100
> >
> > I meant that the range of aperture and speed numbers
> > are scarce.
> >
> >
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre
> > de James Davis
> > Enviado el: viernes, 13 de enero de 2006 11:02
> > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further
> > reduce film camera and
> > accessories production
> >
> > Jos=E9 Royo wrote:
> > > All of us know what the advantages of digital are
> > but, what are we =
> > missing
> > > when moving to digital?
> > >=20
> > > In my opinion, some of the most annoying issues,
> > at least in average
> > digital
> > > cameras, are: deficient control of exposure and
> > very slow response of =
> > the
> > > shutter.
> >
> > My sister bought a Ricoh R2 last month. I was quite
> > impressed that it
> > had a shutter response of 0.06s (for a POS camera).
> >
> > I don't see what you mean about deficient control of
> > exposure though.
> >
> > James
> >
> > --=20
> > http://www.freecharity.org.uk/ - Free hosting for
> > charities
> > http://jamesd.ukgeeks.co.uk/
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with 'subscribe'=20
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with=20
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> > into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:31:53 +0000
> > From: James Davis <jamesd@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further
> > reduce film camera and
> >
> > José Royo wrote:
> > > I meant that the range of aperture and speed
> > numbers are scarce.
> >
> > My D70 has a wider range of aperture and shutter
> > speeds than my
> > Rolleiflex (save that the D70 has no bulb setting)
> > and I find neither
> > particularly restrictive. If you mean consumer POS
> > type cameras, I don't
> > think they are any more restrictive than a
> > comparable film camera.
> >
> > James
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freecharity.org.uk/ - Free hosting for
> > charities
> > http://jamesd.ukgeeks.co.uk/
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:30:22 -0600
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: OT: Nikon to further
> > reduce film camera and accessor
> > From: Peter J Nebergall <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I believe its time will be short.  Something else
> > will become more hip...
> >  Those who would be 'with it" must always be
> > scurrying toward the next
> > hot item...
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 01/13/2006

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: