Carlos, Thanks for the history lesson. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CarlosMFreaza > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 5:56 PM > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [rollei_list] > > There were three Rollei TLR prototypes using a bigger format than 6x6. > In 1930 there was a 7cm x 9cm prototype based on the original > Rolleiflex, it was attempted to replace the focusing knob by > a crank in this model, the camera in the Brunswick Municipal > Museum does not have lens but Prochnow guesses it was used > for the second prototype. > Problem with this prototype was the rectangular format while > keeping the reflex viewfinder like for the square format, the > Newton viewfinder for the vertical format was not comfortable to use. > The second prototype was the 1931 9x9 model, 14 cameras were > hand made, they used 122 film format and a Zeiss Tessar lens > 3.8/100mm with Compur shutter 1/250 fastest speed. This > version was inspired in the > 4x4 Rolleiflex and the original Rolleiflex and had a > sophisticated 4 spindler focusing driver The net format was > 8.5x8.5cm, 6 frames could be taken with the 122 film. This > model was thought for the professional market but it was > assumed that the calculated sales figures did not justify > full-scale production and then the prototype never went into > production, however some professionals photographer used the > 14 hand made prototypes. > The Tessar lens looks very sharp in the contact prints taken > by Dr Wandersleb from Zeiss with the 7x 9 and 9x9 prototypes > and shown in the Report 1 (reduced for the book). > In 1932 was made a third prototype that could change from the > 9x9 format to the 6.5x8.5 format but it never was produced > for the market. > > Carlos > > > > > 2010/3/3 Jeff Kelley <jlkphoto@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Jerry, > > > > Interesting! Do you know if the Rollei 9x9 ever went into > full production? > > There is very little I can find online. Something I just > came across > > said these were "recalled" due to a "soft lens." > > > > Jeff > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:40 PM > >> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [rollei_list] > >> > >> Jeff, > >> > >> Rollei (F&H) did make a 9x9cm camera. I used 9x12cm sheet > film, one > >> sheet at a time, when I could not get 122 film in 1945. > >> > >> Jerry > >> > >> > >> Jeff Kelley wrote: > >> > To keep Allen's theme going I'll mention, for those > >> interested, Kodak > >> > has announced the availability of Ektar 100 film in 4x5 and > >> 8x10 to be > >> > available April, 2010. (I'm amazed....) > >> > > >> > Did Rollei ever make a 4x5 or 8x10 format camera? > >> > > >> > Jeff > >> > > >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Allen Zak > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:49 PM > >> >> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [rollei_list] > >> >> > >> >> Unlike in marriage, it is quite acceptable to like several > >> different > >> >> items in any given category. Betcha there are several > >> Rollei people > >> >> who, while loving Rollei, actually favor Leica. As a prominent > >> >> lesbian once remarked, responding to charges of hetero > apostasies, > >> >> "Just because I'm a cat person doesn't mean I can't pet a > >> puppy once > >> >> in a while." > >> >> > >> >> Allen Zak > >> >> > >> >> On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> Coming onto a Rolleiflex list and telling everybody > your favorite > >> >>> camera is a Mamiya 6 is a new something. I'm not sure what. > >> >>> > >> >>> [Rabs] > >> >>> Mark William Rabiner > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > --- > >> > R > >> > >> --- > >> Rollei List > >> > >> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > >> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > >> > >> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' > >> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > >> > >> - Online, searchable archives are available at > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > >> > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > >> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2716 - Release > >> Date: 03/02/10 23:34:00 > >> > > > > --- > > Rollei List > > > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' > > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release > Date: 03/02/10 23:34:00 > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list